Workplace Rules Violation

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

What judges credited in granted cases

Specific circumstances the judge expressly credited, among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted (a subset of the record, so these are raw counts, not rates).

• acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 4 granted cases

Recent decided examples

• ISCR 06-26768 granted · 2007
  The applicant in this case was a 35-year-old industrial engineer employed by a defense contractor, who faced allegations under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) in the …
• ISCR 17-03898 granted · 2019
  the comment was made in jest and was not intended to be taken seriously. He asserted that the remark was misinterpreted and taken out of context, emphasizing that he did not exhibit any erratic behavi…
• ISCR 16-03183.a1 denied · 2018
  The applicant in this case was an employee of a Defense contractor who had held a security clearance since 2009. The Department of Defense (DoD) denied her security clearance based on concerns under G…
• ISCR 15-04269 denied · 2019
  was a dedicated employee and a trustworthy individual. The applicant, a 39-year-old logistics management specialist employed by a defense contractor, faced security concerns under Guidelines I (Psyc…

See all 758 decisions on this issue →

Related issues under Guideline E

• Falsification of Security Clearance Application · 3,072 cases
• Unspecified Personal Conduct · 2,932 cases
• Omission / Failure to Disclose on Security Form · 2,673 cases
• Lack of Candor in Interview / Investigation · 1,574 cases
• Questionable Judgment (general) · 1,421 cases
• Pattern of Dishonesty or Rule Violations · 609 cases