Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline C · Foreign Preference

Accepting Foreign Benefits, Education, or Entitlements

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
167
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
45%
75 granted · 92 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 11(b)162
¶ 11(a)120
¶ 11(e)102
¶ 11(d)50
¶ 11(c)41

What judges credited in granted cases

Specific circumstances the judge expressly credited, among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted (a subset of the record, so these are raw counts, not rates).

  • family ties to the U.S. · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 19-00378 granted · 2020
    The applicant in this case was a retired British Army lieutenant colonel who held dual citizenship in the United Kingdom and the United States. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons
  • ISCR 16-01895.h1 granted · 2018
    The judge granted the applicant's eligibility for a public trust position, finding no disqualifying foreign influence concerns. The applicant's ties to Colombia, including family and property interest
  • ISCR 06-25959 denied · 2007
    The applicant in this case was a 45-year-old information technology architect who immigrated from Lebanon to the United States in 1983 and became a U.S. citizen in 2002. The Defense Office of Hearings
  • ISCR 07-00434 denied · 2008
    The applicant in this case was a 40-year-old individual who held dual citizenship with Belgium and Canada, in addition to being a U.S. citizen. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons

See all 167 decisions on this issue →

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.