Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline C · Foreign Preference

Voting in a Foreign Election

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does voting in a foreign election affect a security clearance?

Voting in a Foreign Election is an issue decided under Guideline C, Foreign Preference. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 164 hearing-level cases, and 48% of the 164 decided ended with access granted (79 granted, 85 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 164 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

164

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

48%

79 granted · 85 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 11(b) · Dual citizenship from parentage or place of birth alone

    In granted cases
    13
    In denied cases
    3
  • ¶ 11(d) · The foreign citizenship was exercised before becoming a United States citizen

    In granted cases
    11
    In denied cases
    0
  • ¶ 11(a) · The foreign citizenship does not conflict with United States interests

    In granted cases
    8
    In denied cases
    1
  • ¶ 11(e) · The benefits of foreign citizenship raise no security concern

    In granted cases
    8
    In denied cases
    3

Recent decided examples

  • The case involves an applicant seeking a security clearance who has lived in Australia for over twenty years. The applicant admitted to allegations under Guidelines B and C but successfully mitigated …

  • The applicant in this case was a 28-year-old systems analyst employed by a defense contractor since August 2022. She was born in Colombia, became a U.S. citizen in March 2018, and had family members r…

  • Applicant, a defense contractor employee and dual citizen of the United States, Portugal, and France, was denied a security clearance under Guidelines B and C. He owned substantial real estate in Port…

  • Applicant, a dual Belgian-American citizen and scientist for a defense contractor, was denied eligibility for a security clearance. The judge found mitigating evidence sufficient for Guideline B, invo…

See all 164 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline C

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.