Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline H · Drug Involvement

LSD

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
194
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
21%
40 granted · 154 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 26(a)155
¶ 26(b)121
¶ 26(c)71

What judges credited in granted cases

Specific circumstances the judge expressly credited, among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted (a subset of the record, so these are raw counts, not rates).

  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 18-00120 granted · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 31-year-old software engineer who applied for a security clearance on May 5, 2017. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) on February 16, 2018,
  • ISCR 18-02216 granted · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 43-year-old individual who sought a security clearance and faced allegations under Guideline H, concerning drug involvement and substance misuse. The Statement of Reas
  • ISCR 06-26697 denied · 2008
    The applicant in this case was a 38-year-old network engineer for a defense contractor seeking to retain his security clearance. The allegations against him were primarily related to alcohol and drug
  • ISCR 18-02397 denied · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 29-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under Guide

See all 194 decisions on this issue →

Related issues under Guideline H

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.