Skip to content
CASE
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline H · Drug Involvement

Methamphetamine

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does methamphetamine affect a security clearance?

Methamphetamine is an issue decided under Guideline H, Drug Involvement. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 128 hearing-level cases, and 16% of the 128 decided ended with access granted (20 granted, 108 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 128 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

128

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

16%

20 granted · 108 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.

  • ¶ 26(a) · So long ago, or so infrequent, that it is unlikely to recur

    In granted cases
    10
    In denied cases
    5

  • ¶ 26(b) · The involvement acknowledged, with abstinence established

    In granted cases
    10
    In denied cases
    3

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 1 granted case
  • signed intent with revocation clause · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 22-02395Granted2025

    The applicant in this case was a 32-year-old cyber security specialist employed by a defense contractor since May 2019, seeking a security clearance. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agenc…

  • ISCR Case No. 23-02891Granted2025

    The applicant in this case was a 41-year-old software engineer employed by a defense contractor, seeking a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing security c…

  • ISCR Case No. 24-00682Denied2026

    The applicant in this case was a 41-year-old employee of a government contractor who sought a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under Gu…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00447Denied2025

    The applicant in this case was a 39-year-old test and measurement specialist employed by a defense contractor since May 2022. He faced security concerns under Guidelines I (Psychological Conditions), …

See all 128 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline H

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.