Skip to content
CASE

DOHA Administrative Judges

The Administrative Judges who appear in at least five published hearing decisions. Names, case volumes and active years are free. Outcome analytics on each profile are part of Professional.

Jump to a surname

AllABCDEFGHKLMNOPRSTWY

Showing 4 of 83 judges, most published decisions first. Clear the filters.

  • Barry M. Sax

    Published hearing decisions
    236
    Active years
    1997 to 2007

  • Jerome H. Silber

    Published hearing decisions
    44
    Active years
    1997 to 2001

  • Burt Smith

    Published hearing decisions
    29
    Active years
    2001 to 2003

  • Jean E. Smallin

    Published hearing decisions
    22
    Active years
    2007 to 2013
How the process worksA judge writes the decision at the end of a published sequence. Open this for the short version of that sequence.

A contested case follows a published path: a Statement of Reasons, the government's written list of its concerns (an SOR), a written answer, a hearing or a decision on the written record, the judge's decision, and in some cases an appeal.

Read the stages of a DOHA case · Ask a question about the process

Appeal Board judges decide in three member panels, so they are covered in the appeals section rather than listed here. The lawyers on both sides are in the counsel directory.

Outcome analytics by judge is part of Professional.

83 judges in the published hearing record

It opens the grant rate with its denominator, the guideline mix by outcome, the hearing and written record split, the full list of previous decisions, and a Word export.

Professional plan details

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I am researching or teaching

Statistics, exports, monitoring, and the API, arranged individually. For scholarship and public interest work that usually means no charge.

Request access →

Volumes are counts of published decisions. Caseload and case mix differ between judges: an association in the decided record, not causation, and never a prediction.