Found 4,422 matching decisions, showing 3,401–3,450.
Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, citing deliberate falsification of his resume, job application, and security clearance application. The applicant's actions raised significant concerns regarding his trustworthiness and reliability, leading to the denial of ...
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, citing deliberate falsification of information on a security questionnaire and lack of candor during an interview. The applicant's conduct raised significant concerns regarding trustworthiness and reliability, leading to the...
The judge found against the applicant on personal conduct allegations due to deliberate omissions on his security clearance application. The applicant failed to disclose an alcohol-related incident and three overdue debts, which raised concerns about his judgment and reliability. The application for...
The judge found that the applicant's personal conduct concerns were mitigated. The applicant did not disclose a past arrest on her SF-86 due to advice from her attorney, but voluntarily provided the information during an interview with the Defense Security Service. The judge concluded that the appli...
The judge found that the applicant successfully mitigated concerns regarding personal conduct. The applicant's omission of her arrest on the SF 86 was deemed an isolated incident, and she voluntarily disclosed the information during her interview with the Defense Security Service. The judge ruled in...
The judge found against the applicant on multiple allegations of personal conduct, including the deliberate falsification of his security clearance application regarding illegal drug use. The applicant admitted to using cocaine over an extended period but failed to disclose this information, which r...
The judge ruled for the applicant on all personal conduct allegations under Guideline E, finding that the applicant had no intent to falsify information on his security clearance application and had successfully reformed his conduct. The applicant's omissions were attributed to a misunderstanding ba...
The judge found against the applicant on Guideline E due to deliberate omissions in his security clearance application regarding his criminal conduct. The applicant failed to disclose his Article 15 punishment related to drug use, which raised significant concerns about his trustworthiness and relia...
The judge found against the applicant on the personal conduct allegation under Guideline E, determining that the applicant deliberately falsified his security clearance application by omitting information about alcohol-related charges and convictions. The applicant failed to mitigate the security co...
The judge found against the applicant on several personal conduct allegations, including deliberate omissions regarding alcohol use and treatment on his security form. The applicant's failure to report relevant employment history and his ongoing issues with alcohol consumption contributed to the den...
The judge found that the applicant had several financial issues, including arrears on debts and failure to file taxes, but noted that he took corrective actions by resolving debts and filing overdue tax returns. Ultimately, the judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that he successfully m...
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to alcohol consumption. The applicant has a long history of alcohol abuse, including multiple DUI convictions and incidents of appearing at work under the influence. Despite a period of abstinence, the judge determined that the applica...
The applicant was involved in multiple domestic violence incidents between 1988 and 2002, including an argument at work. Despite these incidents, the judge found that the applicant had mitigated the personal conduct concerns through successful completion of anger management training and ongoing marr...
The judge ruled against the applicant regarding drug involvement due to his illegal sale of marijuana while holding a security clearance. The applicant's actions raised significant concerns about his judgment and reliability, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
The applicant had a history of excessive alcohol consumption and multiple DUI convictions from 1982 until June 2003. However, he has been abstinent since June 2003 and successfully mitigated the security concerns related to his alcohol use. The judge ruled in favor of the applicant on all allegation...
The Applicant's personal conduct concerns include intentional falsification of a government questionnaire regarding his criminal history and substance abuse. The judge found against the Applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, concluding that he failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence of re...
The judge found against the applicant on the personal conduct allegation under Guideline E, determining that the applicant's failure to report his alcohol treatment on his security clearance application indicated questionable judgment and unreliability. The applicant's claim of forgetting the treatm...
The judge found against the applicant on two allegations under Guideline E concerning personal conduct. The applicant failed to disclose multiple arrests and convictions on his security clearance application, which raised concerns about his reliability and willingness to comply with rules and regula...
The Applicant faced allegations related to alcohol consumption and criminal conduct but successfully mitigated these concerns. The judge found that the Applicant had matured, demonstrated positive changes in behavior, and did not falsify information on his security clearance application. As a result...
The judge found that the applicant did not intentionally falsify his security clearance application. The omissions regarding his arrest were not deemed deliberate, as the applicant believed he had not been charged with a felony based on his attorney's advice. The judge concluded that the applicant's...
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, citing a pattern of dishonesty and rule violations related to the failure to file income taxes. The applicant's conduct was deemed inconsistent with the national interest, leading to the denial of the security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant deliberately falsified his security-clearance application by omitting charges related to felony offenses. The applicant's explanations for the omissions were not credible, leading to a denial of the security clearance.
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, citing concerns about personal conduct related to his discharge from a court-ordered substance abuse program and deliberate falsification of his security clearance application. The applicant's failure to mitigate these conce...
The judge found in favor of the applicant regarding all allegations under Guideline G concerning alcohol consumption. Although the applicant had a diagnosis of alcohol abuse, he successfully completed counseling and demonstrated moderation in his alcohol consumption, which did not impair his social,...
The judge found against the applicant on the personal conduct allegation due to the failure to disclose a 1998 arrest for Simple Battery on his security clearance application. The omission was deemed to reflect questionable judgment and a lack of candor, leading to a denial of the security clearance...
The judge found for the applicant on the personal conduct concern regarding differing accounts of past marijuana use. The applicant's explanations were deemed credible, and the judge concluded that there was no intentional falsification. The applicant's past conduct was mitigated by the passage of t...
The judge found in favor of the applicant regarding the criminal conduct allegations. The applicant admitted to a single incident of theft, which was deemed an isolated occurrence influenced by emotional distress and alcohol consumption. The judge determined that the applicant mitigated the security...
The judge found that the applicant's underage alcohol consumption did not raise concerns under Guideline G, as it was in moderate amounts and did not lead to social, occupational, or legal problems. The applicant's admissions regarding her past drinking behavior were accepted, and all allegations un...
The judge found against the applicant on all personal conduct allegations under Guideline E. The applicant deliberately failed to disclose her felony larceny conviction and employment termination on her security clearance application, and she provided false statements to a government investigator re...
The judge found that the applicant's criminal conduct was mitigated by the passage of time and recent positive changes in behavior. The applicant had two arrests related to domestic disputes but no convictions, and the judge ruled in favor of the applicant on all allegations under Guideline J, grant...
The judge found in favor of the applicant regarding all allegations under Guideline J, Criminal Conduct. The applicant's history of criminal conduct included several arrests, but evidence of successful rehabilitation and the age of the offenses mitigated security concerns, leading to the granting of...
The judge found that the allegations under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) were unfounded. Although the applicant made incorrect statements regarding an outstanding warrant, the judge concluded that there was no deliberate falsification of information. The applicant believed his statements were true,...
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, determining that the applicant falsified material facts on his security clearance application regarding his drug use. The applicant's explanations did not mitigate the concerns raised by his conduct, leading to a denial of h...
The judge found that the applicant's failure to report a felony theft conviction on his SF 86 was not deliberate, attributing the omission to confusion regarding the expungement process. The judge concluded that the applicant's conduct was mitigated by the passage of time and granted the security cl...
The judge found against the applicant on the personal conduct allegation due to a deliberate omission of a 1995 arrest from his security clearance application. This omission was deemed material and indicative of a lack of candor, which raised security concerns. The applicant's failure to mitigate th...
The judge found against the applicant on personal conduct concerns, specifically regarding omissions and falsifications on his security clearance application. The applicant failed to disclose significant criminal history and substance abuse issues, which raised doubts about his reliability and trust...
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, citing deliberate falsification of a security clearance questionnaire and lack of candor during an interview. The applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns raised by his conduct, leading to a denial of clearance.
The judge found multiple instances of personal conduct that raised security concerns regarding the applicant's trustworthiness. The applicant was found to have deliberately falsified information on his SF 86 and resume, including omissions of arrests and misrepresentation of his educational qualific...
The judge found for the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, concluding that the applicant's past conduct, including deliberate omissions on her security clearance application, was mitigated by her confession, remorse, and rehabilitation. The applicant's security clearance was granted.
The applicant faced allegations under Guideline A concerning his alcohol consumption and related criminal conduct. The judge found against the applicant on all allegations, concluding that his history of alcohol-related offenses and personal conduct raised significant security concerns, ultimately l...
The judge found that the applicant deliberately omitted relevant financial information on her security clearance application, which raised concerns under Guideline E. The applicant's failure to disclose numerous delinquent debts was deemed intentional, leading to a ruling against her under this guid...
The applicant faced allegations under Guideline A concerning his alcohol consumption and personal conduct, which included multiple DUI arrests and falsifications on his security clearance application. The judge found against the applicant on all allegations, concluding that the applicant's history r...
The judge found for the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, concluding that there was no deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification in the applicant's responses on the Security Clearance Application. The applicant's past conduct was mitigated by his credible testimony and the sup...
The judge found against the applicant on all personal conduct allegations, citing a pattern of deliberate falsifications that demonstrated poor judgment and unreliability. The applicant's failure to provide truthful information during the security clearance process was a significant concern, leading...
The judge found against the applicant on allegations of personal conduct due to intentional omissions of marijuana use and a DUI arrest on his security clearance application. The applicant's concealment raised significant security concerns regarding his judgment and reliability, leading to the denia...
The judge found that the applicant mitigated all personal conduct concerns related to his security clearance application. The applicant's incorrect answers on the security clearance application were not deemed deliberate, and he demonstrated positive behavioral changes and responsibility in his pers...
The judge found that the applicant did not intend to submit false or misleading information in his security clearance application. The personal conduct concerns were mitigated, leading to a decision in favor of the applicant under Guideline E.
The judge found against the applicant on personal conduct concerns under Guideline E, primarily due to the applicant's failure to comply with court-ordered restitution following a felony conviction for scheme to defraud. The judge concluded that the applicant's lack of rehabilitation and ongoing fin...
The judge found that the applicant's personal conduct raised significant security concerns, particularly regarding her history of financial irresponsibility and criminal conduct. The applicant's failure to disclose relevant debts on her security clearance application was deemed deliberate, leading t...
The judge found that the applicant's actions, including allowing illegal immigrants to reside in her home and entering into a sham marriage to facilitate their immigration status, raised significant foreign influence concerns. The applicant failed to mitigate these concerns, leading to a denial of h...