Found 2,370 matching decisions — showing 1–50.
Decided public cases — descriptive, never a prediction.
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to financial issues and falsification of her security clearance application. The Applicant admitted to having multiple delinquent accounts and acknowledged her financial struggles. The appeal was affirmed as the Judge's findings...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on financial issues and criminal conduct. The applicant admitted to some debts and a criminal charge but contested the circumstances. The board found no error in the judge's analysis, emphasizing the applicant's failure...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to financial issues, specifically failing to file federal income tax returns and owing significant delinquent taxes. The applicant's appeal was based on claims of his wife's responsibility for tax filings. However, the appeal bo...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The Applicant admitted to three debts, including a delinquent mortgage. The Judge found against the Applicant on the mortgage but in favor on the other debts. The appeal was affirmed as t...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to security concerns under Guideline K and Guideline E. The Applicant admitted to sending classified information on three occasions but denied the allegations under Guideline E. The appeal was affirmed, with the Judge finding no...
The Appeal Board reversed the Administrative Judge's decision to grant the applicant a security clearance due to significant security concerns arising from the applicant's ties to Ukraine amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions with Russia. The Board emphasized the heightened scrutiny required in such ...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to allegations of downloading proprietary information onto a personal USB drive and providing false information during interviews. The Judge found against the Applicant on admitted allegations related to downloading files and de...
The appeal board affirmed the Department of Defense's decision to deny the applicant a security clearance due to his marijuana use. The applicant admitted to using marijuana about five times between mid-2011 and mid-2019 while holding security clearance eligibility. The board found no due process vi...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on criminal conduct and sexual behavior. The applicant admitted to the allegations of being arrested for Electronic Enticement of a Minor and convicted of felony attempted sexual assault. Despite evidence of a successfu...
The appeal board affirmed the adverse decision denying the applicant a security clearance based on multiple criminal charges, including domestic violence and alcohol-related offenses. The applicant contended inaccuracies in the File of Relevant Material but failed to demonstrate harmful error by the...
The Appeal Board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on multiple allegations under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant's workplace conduct raised significant security concerns, including falsification of information and...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The Applicant's appeal did not assert harmful error by the Judge, and the Appeal Board affirmed the decision. The Board is limited to reviewing cases where harmful error is alleged, which...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The applicant's appeal did not assert harmful error by the Judge and included new evidence not considered during the initial decision. The Appeal Board affirmed the Judge's decision, main...
The appeal board reversed the judge's decision granting the applicant a security clearance due to insufficient evidence to mitigate security concerns related to financial issues. The applicant admitted to having 20 delinquent accounts totaling approximately $84,000, and the board found the judge's c...
The appeal board affirmed the decision denying the applicant a security clearance based on financial considerations. The applicant partially admitted to failing to file taxes and having delinquent debts. The board found no harmful errors in the judge's analysis, concluding that the applicant's finan...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to security concerns under Guideline E related to personal conduct. The applicant was fired for distributing prescription medications and using employer resources for this purpose. The appeal was denied as the applicant did not ...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to financial issues, specifically failing to file tax returns and having delinquent debts. The Judge found against the Applicant on four allegations related to these financial concerns. The Applicant's appeal was unsuccessful, a...
The appeal board affirmed the Department of Defense's decision to deny the applicant a security clearance due to repeated failures to file tax returns as required. The applicant admitted to deficiencies for certain years but denied others. The board found no evidence that the judge's decision was ar...
The Appeal Board affirmed the decision denying the applicant a trustworthiness designation based on allegations under Guideline F related to financial considerations. The applicant's appeal did not demonstrate harmful error by the Judge, and new evidence was not considered. The decision was signed b...
The appeal board affirmed the decision denying the applicant a security clearance based on allegations under Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) and Guideline E (Personal Conduct). The applicant did not assert harmful error by the judge, leading to the affirmation of the adverse decision.
In ISCR Case No. 18-02018, the Appeal Board affirmed the Judge's decision that the Applicant committed a sexual assault, which raised security concerns under Guideline D. The Judge found in favor of the Applicant on Guideline E allegations. The Applicant's appeal raised issues of authority, bias, an...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a security clearance due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The Applicant admitted to having significant delinquent debts but argued that they were not indicative of a financial problem. The appeal board affirmed the decision, stating the Judge's ...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on admitted delinquent student loans under Guideline F. The applicant's financial irresponsibility and failure to mitigate security concerns were highlighted, despite favorable findings under Guideline B. The decision e...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to financial concerns, including 15 delinquent debts totaling approximately $43,500 and three bankruptcy filings. The applicant admitted to ten allegations but denied others. The appeal raised issues of bias and discrimination, ...
The appeal board affirmed the Department of Defense's decision to deny the applicant a security clearance based on financial considerations, specifically two delinquent student loans totaling approximately $49,500. The applicant admitted to the allegations but argued that he had entered a rehabilita...
The Department of Defense denied the Applicant a trustworthiness designation due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The Applicant had 11 delinquent debts totaling approximately $24,500, admitting to the allegations but only partially mitigating them. The Judge found in favor of the Applicant o...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance based on security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) and Guideline E (Personal Conduct). The applicant's appeal did not assert harmful error by the Judge, leading to the affirmation of the adverse decision.
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant's appeal did not assert harmful error by the Judge, and new evidence submitted post-decision was not considered. The Appeal Board affirmed the adve...
The appeal board remanded the decision regarding the applicant's security clearance due to due process issues related to the submission of evidence. The applicant admitted to having nine delinquent debts totaling approximately $55,000. The board noted procedural errors in the handling of the applica...
The Appeal Board affirmed the decision denying the applicant a security clearance based on security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant did not allege harmful error by the Judge, and the Board's review was limited to the existing record without new evidence. The deci...
The appeal board affirmed the decision denying the applicant a security clearance due to failure to file federal income tax returns for 2006 and 2010. The applicant's claims of resolving these issues were found unconvincing, and his credibility was questioned. The board noted that the applicant had ...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on security concerns under Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption) and Guideline E (Personal Conduct). The applicant's appeal did not assert harmful error by the judge and included new evidence regarding probation terms, whic...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The applicant admitted to having eight delinquent debts totaling over $36,400. Despite efforts to resolve some debts, the judge found the applicant's financial situation ongoing and not u...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance due to admitted financial issues, including failure to file tax returns and delinquent debts. The applicant's arguments regarding the government's burden of proof and the judge's credibility determinations were found unpersua...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance due to drug involvement and substance misuse. The applicant admitted to misusing prescription medication from June 2017 to August 2020. Despite claiming to have made changes to stop abusing medication, the appeal board affirmed the ...
The applicant admitted six of seven allegations related to financial issues, including owing approximately $102,000 in taxes and failing to file state income tax returns. The appeal board affirmed the adverse decision, noting that while the applicant made some efforts to resolve his tax issues, they...
The appeal board affirmed the decision denying the applicant a security clearance due to failure to file federal income tax returns from 2012 to 2018. The applicant's claims of working with a tax resolution company were deemed insufficient as he provided no documentation to support his assertions. T...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on a history of financial difficulties, including multiple bankruptcies. The applicant failed to demonstrate that the judge erred in findings regarding liabilities. Despite claims of improved financial management, the b...
The appeal of the applicant for a security clearance was denied based on unresolved delinquent debts totaling nearly $22,500. The applicant's arguments regarding personal circumstances were deemed insufficient to overturn the judge's decision, which was affirmed. The case highlights the importance o...
The appeal board affirmed the Department of Defense's decision to deny the applicant a security clearance due to marijuana use, which remains illegal under federal law despite state-level legalization. The applicant admitted to using marijuana while holding a security clearance and expressed intent ...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance due to unresolved delinquent debts totaling approximately $31,900. The applicant admitted to the debts but failed to demonstrate a good-faith effort to repay them. The board found no error in the judge's conclusions regarding...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance due to serious misconduct, including misuse of a company computer for accessing explicit material and labor mischarging. The applicant's attempts to mitigate these issues were deemed insufficient, as he had previously omitted...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance due to unresolved financial issues, specifically failure to file tax returns and delinquent taxes. The board found that the applicant's actions reflected a pattern of irresponsibility and poor judgment, which negatively impac...
The appeal of the applicant for a security clearance was denied based on financial considerations under Guideline F. The applicant did not assert harmful error by the judge and presented new evidence not considered in the original decision. The Appeal Board affirmed the judge's decision, maintaining...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on financial considerations and personal conduct. The applicant admitted to having 11 delinquent debts totaling approximately $27,700 and a history of misconduct leading to termination from a federal position. Despite a...
The appeal board affirmed the denial of the applicant's security clearance based on findings of dishonesty related to academic misconduct and foreign influence concerns due to close ties with family in Lebanon. The applicant admitted to cheating on university exams, which raised doubts about his rel...
The Department of Defense denied the applicant a security clearance based on concerns under Guidelines J, H, and E. The case was remanded for the applicant to submit additional evidence that was claimed to have been submitted but not received. The appeal raised issues regarding the Judge's decision ...
The appeal of the applicant for a security clearance was denied based on security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant did not assert harmful error by the Judge and presented new evidence not considered during the initial decision. The Appeal Board affirmed the advers...
The appeal board affirmed the adverse decision denying the applicant a security clearance based on drug involvement under Guideline H. The applicant's marijuana use, both before and after obtaining a clearance, raised security concerns. Despite the applicant's claims of intent to abstain, the board ...
The Appeal Board affirmed the decision denying the Applicant a security clearance based on security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Applicant did not allege harmful error by the Judge, which limited the Board's review authority. The decision was signed by the Administrativ...