Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline F · Financial
Financial Fraud / Check Kiting / Embezzlement
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.
Decided cases
66
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
15%
10 granted · 56 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions cited
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are numbers of cases, not rates. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 20(a) | 4 | 1 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 16-03631.h1 granted · 2018The judge found that the applicant had several delinquent debts totaling over $27,000, but determined that he had made a good-faith effort to resolve these debts. The applicant's financial difficultie…
- ISCR 17-00778.h1 granted · 2017The judge found that the applicant's financial issues, including several debts and a felony theft conviction, were mitigated. The applicant demonstrated responsible behavior by resolving most debts an…
- ISCR 20-01308 denied · 2021The applicant in this case was a 33-year-old inventory technician employed by a defense contractor since 2018. The Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility issued a Statement of Reaso…
- ISCR 20-02406 denied · 2023The applicant in this case was a 36-year-old database administrator who had previously served in the U.S. Air Force. He faced security concerns under Guideline F (financial considerations) and Guideli…
Related issues under Guideline F
- Credit Card Debt · 4,694 cases
- Medical Debt · 3,844 cases
- Unpaid Federal/State Taxes · 3,187 cases
- Auto Loan / Vehicle Repossession · 2,794 cases
- Utility / Phone / Cable Debt · 2,339 cases
- Student Loan Debt · 2,229 cases
For questions about how this issue has been treated on particular facts, the assistant searches the record, and the CASE Prep service provides a written, human-reviewed response. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.