Skip to content
CASE
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Foreign Employment / Pension

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does foreign employment / pension affect a security clearance?

Foreign Employment / Pension is an issue decided under Guideline B, Foreign Influence. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 95 hearing-level cases, and 51% of the 95 decided ended with access granted (48 granted, 47 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 95 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

95

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

51%

48 granted · 47 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.

  • ¶ 8(a) · A conflict between foreign and United States interests is unlikely

    In granted cases
    17
    In denied cases
    2

  • ¶ 8(b) · Deep and longstanding ties to the United States

    In granted cases
    14
    In denied cases
    1

  • ¶ 8(e) · Reporting requirements met promptly

    In granted cases
    6
    In denied cases
    1

  • ¶ 8(f) · Foreign interests too small to be used for influence

    In granted cases
    4
    In denied cases
    1

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 7 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 22-00869Granted2023

    The applicant in this case was a 62-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under the f…

  • ISCR Case No. 21-00223Granted2022

    the administrative judge found that Applicant mitigated the security concerns related to foreign influence as outlined in Guideline B. The Statement of Reasons (SOR) issued by the Department of Defens…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00899Denied2026

    The applicant's security clearance application was denied due to failure to mitigate foreign influence concerns related to relationships with individuals from the People's Republic of China. The appli…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-01308Denied2026

    Applicant, a defense contractor employee and dual citizen of the United States, Portugal, and France, was denied a security clearance under Guidelines B and C. He owned substantial real estate in Port…

See all 95 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline B

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.