Summary
A 59-year-old retired U.S. Army sergeant was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) related to family ties in South Korea. The Statement of Reasons cited that the applicant had a brother, two half-brothers, a sister, and a half-sister who are all citizens and residents of South Korea. Additionally, three nephews are South Korean citizens and residents; one serves in the South Korean Air Force, another in the South Korean Army Reserve, and a third completed mandatory military service in the South Korean Army before becoming an English teacher.
Disqualifying conditions under Guideline B were raised, specifically regarding immediate family and other relatives who are foreign citizens. However, the judge applied several mitigating conditions. The applicant demonstrated extensive ties to the U.S. through military service and citizenship, and their financial interests and retirement plans are centered within the U.S.
Ultimately, the judge concluded that the applicant's strong connections to the U.S. and limited contact with family in South Korea sufficiently mitigated the foreign influence concerns, determining that no significant risk was present. The security clearance was therefore granted.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant has extensive ties to the U.S. through military service and citizenship.
- The applicant's financial interests and plans for retirement are centered in the U.S.
- The applicant's contact with family in South Korea is limited and does not create a significant risk of foreign influence.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to a Foreign Person That Create a Potential Conflict of Interest
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedNature of Relationships with Foreign Persons Is Unlikely to Create a Conflict of Interest
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedMinimal Conflict of Interest Due to Strong Ties to the U.S.
- AG ¶ 8(c)rejectedCasual or Infrequent Contact with Foreign CitizensThe applicant's contact with family members is not casual or infrequent.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedApr 4, 2018
- Answer filedMay 1, 2018
- Hearing heldNov 8, 2018
- Decision dateFeb 26, 2019
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Importance of U.S. Ties in Evaluating Foreign Family Connections
- Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Determinations