CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 07-01252 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 07-01252

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date2/9/2009
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Joseph Testan
Government Counsel: Candace L. Le'i
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 43-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance under Guideline B, concerning foreign influence. The Statement of Reasons (SOR) issued by the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) raised concerns primarily due to the applicant's marriage to a citizen of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and his connections to family members residing in the PRC, including in-laws and a sister-in-law whose husband worked for the PRC government.
The applicant admitted to his marriage and the familial ties in the PRC but asserted that his loyalty to the United States was unwavering. He traveled to the PRC multiple times and acknowledged that his wife communicated with her family in the PRC. However, he did not provide sufficient evidence to mitigate the concerns raised by these relationships, particularly regarding the potential for foreign influence or coercion. The administrative judge found that the applicant's connections to the PRC, combined with the nature of the PRC's intelligence activities targeting U.S. citizens, created a heightened risk of foreign exploitation.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that he failed to demonstrate that granting him a security clearance would be consistent with national security interests. The judge emphasized that the applicant's loyalty was not in question, but the potential risks associated with his foreign connections were significant enough to deny his eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 07-01252

deniedFeb 9, 2009· Hon. Joseph Testan· hearing

Summary

A 43-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) due to significant concerns regarding his connections to the People's Republic of China (PRC). The denial was based on several factors, including his marriage to a PRC citizen and the presence of multiple family members, including in-laws, who are citizens and residents of the PRC.

Further concerns arose from the applicant's repeated travel to the PRC and his spouse's ongoing communication with her family there. Specifically, a sister-in-law's husband is employed by the PRC government, which heightened the risk of foreign exploitation.

The Administrative Judge concluded that these foreign ties and travel history presented a substantial security risk, making the granting of a security clearance inconsistent with national security. The applicant's claims of loyalty to the U.S. were considered, but ultimately, the security risks associated with his foreign connections led to the denial.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant's spouse is a citizen of the PRC, raising concerns of foreign influence.
The applicant has family members residing in the PRC, including a sister-in-law whose husband works for the PRC government.
The applicant's travel to the PRC and ongoing communication with foreign relatives create a heightened risk of foreign exploitation.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG 7.araisedContact with a Foreign Family Member
AG 7.braisedConnections to a Foreign Government
AG 7.draisedSharing Living Quarters with a Foreign National
AG 7.iraisedConduct While Traveling Outside the U.S.

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt as to whether access to classified information is clearly consistent with national security will be resolved in favor of the national security.”
— Directive, Paragraph E2.2.2.

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedApr 16, 2007
Answer filedMay 21, 2007
Hearing held—Decision made without a hearing.
Decision dateFeb 9, 2009

Cite For

Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
Impact of Foreign Family Ties on Security Clearance Eligibility
The Burden of Proof on the Applicant to Mitigate Disqualifying Conditions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to foreign influence due to ties to the People's Republic of China (PRC). The applicant's wife is a PRC citizen, and the applicant has family ties in the PRC, including in-laws who are citizens and residents. The applicant's travel to the PRC and the communication of his spouse with family in the PRC raised concerns about potential coercion. The decision ultimately denied the applicant's eligibility for a security clearance.

Country conditions:the decision took administrative notice of official facts about the foreign country (the Government’s country submission).

U.S. ties the decision noted: Intent to Remain in U.S.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Relationship	Country	Response	Disqualifying (¶7)	Mitigating applied (¶8)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant's wife is a PRC citizen, raising concerns about foreign influence.	Against Applicant	Spouse Dual or Foreign Citizen Immediate Family	People's Republic of China HEIGHTENED RISK	Denied	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other
1.b	Applicant has family ties in the PRC, including in-laws who are citizens and residents.	Against Applicant	In Law in Foreign Country Immediate Family	People's Republic of China HEIGHTENED RISK	Denied	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other
1.c	Applicant has traveled to the PRC multiple times, increasing vulnerability to foreign influence.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Foreign Relationship Other	People's Republic of China HEIGHTENED RISK	Denied	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other
1.d	Applicant's spouse communicates with family in the PRC, raising concerns of potential coercion.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Foreign Relationship Other	People's Republic of China HEIGHTENED RISK	Denied	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline B). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.