Summary
This security clearance decision involved a 57-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, originally from Turkey, under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). Concerns were raised due to the applicant's family and friends residing in Turkey, his birth and upbringing there, and his retirement as a colonel from the Turkish military in 2012. Additional factors included his father, a Turkish citizen with severe dementia, two veteran friends in Turkey, ownership of an inherited home in Turkey, and receipt of a Turkish military pension. The applicant had not traveled to Turkey since 2016.
Disqualifying conditions under Guideline B were considered, but mitigating conditions were applied. The judge determined that the applicant's financial interests in Turkey were minimal compared to his U.S. interests. Furthermore, his communication with family in Turkey was infrequent and did not suggest a risk of foreign influence.
Ultimately, the applicant's long-standing ties and loyalty to the U.S., demonstrated through his military service and naturalization, were established. The judge concluded that the applicant's connections to Turkey did not pose a significant national security risk, and the security clearance was GRANTED.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant's financial interests in Turkey were minimal compared to his interests in the U.S.
- The applicant's communication with family in Turkey was infrequent and did not indicate a risk of foreign influence.
- The applicant's long-standing ties and loyalty to the U.S. were established through his military service and naturalization.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family MembersContact with family members in Turkey raised concerns about potential foreign influence.
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign PersonsConnections to former military colleagues in Turkey raised concerns about divided allegiance.
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedMinimal Conflict of InterestThe applicant's deep ties to the U.S. outweighed any potential conflict of interest.
- AG ¶ 8(c)appliedInfrequent Contact with Foreign CitizensThe applicant's limited communication with friends and family in Turkey was deemed insufficient to create a risk of foreign influence.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMar 12, 2021
- Answer filedApr 5, 2021Applicant requested a decision based on the written record.
- Hearing heldJun 8, 2022Hearing conducted via videoteleconference.
- Decision dateSep 30, 2022
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Importance of U.S. Ties in Evaluating Foreign Contacts
- Consideration of the Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Decisions.