CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-02209 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 23-02209

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/29/2024
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the hearing decision (Case 23-02209) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Marc E. Curry
Government Counsel: Alison P. O'Connell
Case Summary
Applicant, a 52-year-old male, sought a security clearance after receiving a Statement of Reasons (SOR) from the Department of Defense, citing concerns under Guideline B regarding foreign influence due to his family ties in Ghana and property interests there. The SOR highlighted potential risks associated with his wife, a Ghanaian resident alien, and his financial connections to Ghana.
During the proceedings, Applicant admitted to the allegations in the SOR but provided context and mitigation. He explained that he had immigrated to the United States in 2013 and had since worked as a diplomatic security officer. His wife, who recently obtained U.S. permanent resident status, still works for the Ghanaian government but is in the process of resigning. Applicant maintained regular contact with his children in Ghana, sending financial support, and emphasized his commitment to U.S. interests, noting that he has lived in the U.S. for over a decade and has three children residing there, including a son in the U.S. Army.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of Applicant, granting him a security clearance. The judge found that while disqualifying conditions under Guideline B were applicable, the mitigating factors outweighed the concerns. The judge noted the friendly relationship between the U.S. and Ghana, the infrequency of Applicant's contact with his half-sister, and the fact that his immediate family was primarily based in the U.S. These factors contributed to the conclusion that there was no significant risk of foreign influence or exploitation.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-02209

grantedMar 29, 2024· Hon. Marc E. Curry· hearing

Summary

A 52-year-old male applicant, originally from Ghana, was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The Statement of Reasons identified potential disqualifying conditions related to his family in Ghana, his wife (a Ghanaian resident alien), and his property interests in Ghana.

However, the applicant successfully mitigated these concerns. He demonstrated strong ties to the U.S., having resided here for over ten years. Furthermore, his family members in Ghana are financially independent adults, and his property interests there were deemed minimal, reducing the likelihood of a conflict of interest or undue foreign influence.

Ultimately, the adjudicator applied mitigating conditions, concluding that the applicant's strong U.S. ties and the nature of his foreign connections sufficiently addressed the security concerns. As a result, the applicant's security clearance was granted.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant has lived in the U.S. for over ten years, establishing strong ties and relationships here.
The applicant's family members in Ghana are adults and financially independent, reducing the risk of foreign influence.
The applicant's property interests in Ghana are minimal and not likely to create a conflict of interest.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
AG ¶ 7(e)raisedSharing Living Quarters with Foreign Persons
AG ¶ 7(f)raisedSubstantial Business, Financial, or Property Interests in a Foreign Country

Mitigating

AG ¶ 8(b)appliedNo Conflict of Interest Due to Strong U.S. Ties
AG ¶ 8(c)appliedCasual and Infrequent Contact with Foreign Citizens
AG ¶ 8(f)appliedRoutine Nature of Foreign Financial Interests

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedOct 26, 2023
Answer filed—Applicant admitted all allegations.
Hearing heldFeb 5, 2024Conducted via video teleconference.
Decision dateMar 29, 2024

Cite For

Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
Importance of Strong U.S. Ties in Foreign Influence Cases
Consideration of the Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Decisions.

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant mitigated foreign influence security concerns related to his family in Ghana, including his wife, a Ghanaian resident alien, and his property interests in Ghana. The decision concluded that the applicant's ties to Ghana did not pose a significant risk to national security, leading to the granting of his security clearance eligibility.

Country conditions:the decision took administrative notice of official facts about the foreign country (the Government’s country submission).

U.S. ties the decision noted: U.S. Spouse or Partner · U.S. Children · Intent to Remain in U.S.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Relationship	Country	Response	Disqualifying (¶7)	Mitigating applied (¶8)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns generated by his family in Ghana, his wife, a Ghanian resident alien, and by his Ghanaian property interests.	For Applicant	Spouse Dual or Foreign Citizen Immediate Family	Ghana	Admitted	—	(b) deep/longstanding U.S. loyalties; conflict resolves in favor of the U.S.	Claimed Other
1.b–1.h	7 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (for the applicant). (low confidence)	For Applicant	Unspecified Foreign Relationship Other	—		—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline B). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.