CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-00814 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 22-00814

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date7/12/2023
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Judge: Edward W. Loughran
Government Counsel: Andrew H. Henderson
Applicant's Counsel: Dale Andersen
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 46-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under Guideline B (foreign influence) due to the applicant's connections to Taiwan through his wife, who is a dual citizen of the United States and Taiwan. The SOR raised issues regarding potential divided allegiance and the risk of foreign exploitation due to the applicant's familial ties in Taiwan.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to having family members in Taiwan, including his mother-in-law and siblings-in-law, but emphasized the limited nature of his contact with them, primarily due to language barriers. He expressed his loyalty to the United States and provided evidence of his community involvement and character references attesting to his trustworthiness. The applicant argued that his wife's family could not coerce him into revealing classified information, and he maintained that his ties to the U.S. were strong and unwavering.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that he had successfully mitigated the foreign influence concerns. The judge found that the nature of the applicant's relationships with his wife's family, combined with his demonstrated loyalty to the United States and lack of significant contact with his in-laws, made it unlikely that he would face a conflict of interest. The decision ultimately granted the applicant eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-00814

grantedJul 12, 2023· Hon. Edward W. Loughran· hearing

Summary

A 46-year-old defense contractor was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The Statement of Reasons raised several allegations related to foreign influence, specifically citing disqualifying conditions AG ¶ 7(a), AG ¶ 7(b), and AG ¶ 7(e). These concerns stemmed from the applicant's family ties in Taiwan, particularly his wife's family.

However, the administrative judge determined that the applicant had successfully mitigated these security concerns. The decision highlighted the application of mitigating conditions AG ¶ 8(a) and AG ¶ 8(b). The applicant demonstrated deep and longstanding relationships and loyalties within the United States, which were considered significant factors.

Furthermore, the applicant provided credible testimony that his wife's family lacked the ability to coerce him into revealing classified information. Ultimately, the judge concluded that the applicant's ties to Taiwan were outweighed by his strong commitment to U.S. interests, leading to the granting of the security clearance.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant demonstrated deep and longstanding relationships and loyalties in the United States.
The applicant credibly testified that his wife's family could not coerce him into revealing classified information.
The applicant's ties to Taiwan were outweighed by his commitment to U.S. interests.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign Persons Creating Potential Conflict of Interest
AG ¶ 7(e)raisedShared Living Quarters with Foreign Persons

Mitigating

AG ¶ 8(a)appliedNature of Relationships with Foreign Persons Unlikely to Create Conflict
AG ¶ 8(b)appliedMinimal Conflict of Interest Due to Deep U.S. Ties

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedAug 4, 2022
Answer filedSep 7, 2022
Hearing heldMay 17, 2023
Decision dateJul 12, 2023

Cite For

Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
Importance of Deep U.S. Ties in Security Clearance Decisions
Credibility of Applicant's Testimony Regarding Foreign Family Influence

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns related to his ties to Taiwan. Despite the potential risks associated with his wife's family in Taiwan, the applicant's strong connections and loyalty to the United States were deemed sufficient to alleviate any security concerns. The decision was granted, affirming the applicant's eligibility for a security clearance.

Country conditions:the decision took administrative notice of official facts about the foreign country (the Government’s country submission).

U.S. ties the decision noted: Naturalized U.S. Citizen · U.S. Spouse or Partner · U.S. Children · U.S. Home or Property · U.S. Career or Business · Community or Civic Involvement · Intent to Remain in U.S.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Relationship	Country	Response	Disqualifying (¶7)	Mitigating applied (¶8)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns.	For Applicant	Parent in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Taiwan HEIGHTENED RISK	Unknown	—	(a) relationships such that a conflict between foreign and U.S. interests is unlikely (b) deep/longstanding U.S. loyalties; conflict resolves in favor of the U.S. (e) promptly complied with reporting requirements	Credited Deep U.S. Ties Claimed Other
1.b	Applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns.	For Applicant	Parent in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Taiwan HEIGHTENED RISK	Unknown	—	(a) relationships such that a conflict between foreign and U.S. interests is unlikely (b) deep/longstanding U.S. loyalties; conflict resolves in favor of the U.S. (e) promptly complied with reporting requirements	Credited Deep U.S. Ties Claimed Other
1.c	Applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns.	For Applicant	Parent in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Taiwan HEIGHTENED RISK	Unknown	—	(a) relationships such that a conflict between foreign and U.S. interests is unlikely (b) deep/longstanding U.S. loyalties; conflict resolves in favor of the U.S. (e) promptly complied with reporting requirements	Credited Deep U.S. Ties Claimed Other
1.d	Applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns.	For Applicant	Parent in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Taiwan HEIGHTENED RISK	Unknown	—	(a) relationships such that a conflict between foreign and U.S. interests is unlikely (b) deep/longstanding U.S. loyalties; conflict resolves in favor of the U.S. (e) promptly complied with reporting requirements	Credited Deep U.S. Ties Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline B). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.