CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-02460 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 22-02460

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/31/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Carol G. Ricciardello
Government Counsel: Aubrey M. De Angelis
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 50-year-old individual who had dual citizenship in the United States and Colombia. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline B, foreign influence, primarily due to the applicant's familial ties and financial interests in Colombia. The applicant admitted to all allegations in the SOR, which included maintaining regular contact with family members in Colombia, including a father with a criminal history, and owning property there.
The applicant provided some context for his situation, stating that he felt more American than Colombian and had no intention of returning to Venezuela, from which he had relinquished citizenship. He expressed that he would fight for the United States in a conflict with Colombia but acknowledged uncertainty about his loyalties. Despite his admissions, the administrative judge found that the applicant's connections to Colombia, including financial support to his father and regular communication with relatives, posed a potential risk for divided allegiance. Consequently, the judge ruled against the applicant, denying eligibility for access to classified information, emphasizing the need to prioritize national security over personal circumstances.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-02460

deniedAug 31, 2023· Hon. Carol G. Ricciardello· hearing

Summary

A 50-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, originally from Colombia, was denied a security clearance under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The denial stemmed from the applicant's extensive family ties and financial interests in Colombia, which raised significant security concerns.

Specifically, the applicant maintained dual citizenship and provided ongoing financial support to his father in Colombia. These factors were identified as creating a heightened risk of foreign influence, aligning with disqualifying conditions under AG ¶ 7(a), AG ¶ 7(b), and AG ¶ 7(f).

The administrative judge concluded that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to mitigate these concerns, particularly regarding his dual citizenship and financial support to family members abroad. Consequently, the applicant was deemed ineligible for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant maintained significant ties to Colombia, including family connections and financial interests, which raised security concerns.
The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to alleviate the concerns regarding foreign influence.
The applicant's dual citizenship and financial support to his father in Colombia created a heightened risk of foreign influence.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 7(a)appliedContact with Foreign Family Members
AG ¶ 7(b)appliedPotential Conflict of Interest
AG ¶ 7(f)appliedSubstantial Financial Interests in a Foreign Country

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedDec 21, 2022
Answer filedFeb 23, 2023Applicant elected to have the case decided on the written record.
Hearing held—No hearing; decision based on written record.
Decision dateAug 31, 2023

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Foreign Influence Under Guideline B
Impact of Dual Citizenship on Security Clearance Eligibility
Failure to Mitigate Foreign Influence Concerns Through Family Ties and Financial Interests

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant failed to mitigate security concerns under Guideline B related to foreign influence. The applicant has significant ties to Colombia, including family connections and financial interests, which the judge determined posed a heightened risk of foreign influence. Consequently, the application for a security clearance was denied.

Country conditions:the decision took administrative notice of official facts about the foreign country (the Government’s country submission).

U.S. ties the decision noted: Naturalized U.S. Citizen

¶	Allegation	Finding	Relationship	Country	Response	Disqualifying (¶7)	Mitigating applied (¶8)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns under Guideline B, foreign influence.	Against Applicant	Parent in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Colombia HEIGHTENED RISK	Admitted	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation (b) connections creating a potential conflict of interest (c) failure to report or disclose association with a foreign person/group/government	—	—
1.b–1.h	7 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant).	Against Applicant	Unspecified Foreign Relationship Other	—		—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline B). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.