CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-00560 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 23-00560

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date5/31/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Judge: Marc E. Curry
Government Counsel: David F. Hayes
Applicant's Counsel: Joshua Sindel
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 34-year-old aerospace engineer employed by a defense contractor, seeking a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline B (foreign influence), primarily due to the applicant's marriage to a Russian citizen and the presence of her parents, both Russian citizens, which raised potential risks of foreign influence.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the allegations in the SOR. He provided details about his wife’s background, her education in the U.S., and their limited contact with her family in Russia, which included a significant financial obligation in the form of a $100,000 loan from his in-laws. Despite the applicant's strong work performance and positive character references, the administrative judge found that the nature of his familial ties to Russia, particularly the military background of his father-in-law and the financial dependency, created an unacceptable security risk.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that the mitigating factors did not sufficiently alleviate the concerns raised by his foreign connections. The judge emphasized that the applicant's circumstances presented a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-00560

deniedMay 31, 2024· Hon. Marc E. Curry· hearing

Summary

A 34-year-old aerospace engineer was denied a security clearance under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) due to his familial ties to Russian citizens. The applicant's spouse is a Russian citizen and U.S. permanent resident, while her parents are Russian citizens residing in Russia. His father-in-law is a retired colonel in the Russian Navy.

The Statement of Reasons highlighted these relationships, noting that the applicant communicates with his in-laws approximately once a month via text. A significant financial obligation was also cited, as the applicant is currently repaying a $100,000 personal loan to his in-laws. These factors raised disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guideline Paragraph 7(a).

Despite the applicant's strong professional reputation and community involvement, the judge determined that the familial ties and substantial financial obligation to Russian nationals, particularly his father-in-law, posed an unacceptable security risk. The infrequent contact with his in-laws was deemed insufficient to mitigate these concerns, leading to the denial of his security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant's spouse and in-laws are Russian citizens, creating a significant security risk under Guideline B.
The applicant has a substantial financial obligation to his father-in-law, a retired colonel in the Russian Navy.
The applicant's infrequent contact with his in-laws was insufficient to mitigate the security concerns.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 7(a)appliedContact with Foreign Family Members

Key Rule Quoted

“A Guideline B adjudication is not a judgment on an applicant’s character, patriotism, or loyalty to the United States. Instead, it is a determination as to whether an applicant’s circumstances foreseeably present a security risk.”
— ISCR Case No. 19-00831 at 5 (App. Bd. July 29, 2020)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedMar 14, 2023
Answer filedMar 20, 2023
Hearing heldFeb 6, 2024
Decision dateMay 31, 2024

Cite For

Security Risks Associated with Foreign Influence Under Guideline B
Impact of Familial Financial Obligations on Security Clearance Eligibility
The Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Determinations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant's foreign ties, particularly through his Russian spouse and in-laws, posed significant security risks. The applicant's financial obligations and communication with his in-laws were deemed to create a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, leading to a denial of his security clearance.

Country conditions:the decision took administrative notice of official facts about the foreign country (the Government’s country submission).

U.S. ties the decision noted: U.S. Home or Property · U.S. Career or Business

¶	Allegation	Finding	Relationship	Country	Response	Disqualifying (¶7)	Mitigating applied (¶8)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant’s spouse, a Russian citizen currently living with him in the United States as a permanent U.S. resident, together with her parents, both Russian citizens and residents, render Applicant an unacceptable security risk.	Against Applicant	Spouse Dual or Foreign Citizen Immediate Family	Russia HEIGHTENED RISK	Admitted	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other
1.b	Applicant communicates with his in-laws approximately once per month by text and has a significant financial obligation to them, as he is currently repaying a $100,000 personal loan.	Against Applicant	In Law in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Russia HEIGHTENED RISK	Admitted	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other
1.c	Applicant's father-in-law is a retired colonel in the Russian Navy, which raises security concerns due to the nature of their relationship and the country involved.	Against Applicant	In Law in Foreign Country Immediate Family GOVT-AFFILIATED	Russia HEIGHTENED RISK	Admitted	(a) contact with a foreign family member/associate/friend creating a heightened risk of exploitation	—	Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline B). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.