CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-01181 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-01181

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date7/10/2025
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Edward W. Loughran
Government Counsel: Daniel P. O'Reilley
Case Summary
Applicant was a 54-year-old prospective employee of a defense contractor seeking a security clearance for the first time. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline B (foreign influence), primarily due to the applicant's familial ties to Iraq, including a sibling who is a senior official in the Kurdistan Regional Government. The SOR raised concerns about the potential for divided allegiance and the risk of coercion or manipulation by foreign interests.
During the hearing, the applicant admitted to having multiple family members in Iraq and acknowledged the potential risks associated with these connections. However, he emphasized his loyalty to the United States, citing his service as a linguist in support of U.S. military operations in Iraq and his status as a naturalized U.S. citizen. He provided evidence of his strong moral character and past compliance with security protocols, asserting that his family could not be used to coerce him into revealing classified information.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that he had mitigated the foreign influence concerns. The judge found that the applicant's deep and longstanding ties to the United States, along with his credible testimony regarding his ability to resist coercion, outweighed the potential risks associated with his family connections in Iraq. The decision ultimately granted the applicant eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline BForeign Influence · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-01181

grantedJul 10, 2025· Hon. Edward W. Loughran· hearing

Summary

A 54-year-old prospective defense contractor employee was granted a security clearance under Guideline B (Foreign Influence), despite initial concerns regarding his ties to Iraq. The administrative judge determined that these connections did not present a risk of coercion or undue pressure.

The Statement of Reasons initially raised concerns under Disqualifying Conditions AG ¶ 7(a), AG ¶ 7(b), and AG ¶ 7(e). However, the applicant successfully mitigated these issues, as noted in Allegation 1.a, by demonstrating that his family in Iraq could not compel him to disclose classified information.

The decision to grant the clearance was based on several factors, including the applicant's credible testimony and his strong history of loyalty to the U.S., evidenced by his work in dangerous conditions supporting U.S. military operations. Furthermore, his deep and longstanding relationships within the U.S. were considered to mitigate any potential conflict of interest, leading to the application of Mitigating Condition AG ¶ 8(b).

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant credibly testified that his family in Iraq could not coerce him into revealing classified information.
He has a strong history of loyalty to the U.S., having worked under dangerous conditions in support of U.S. military operations.
The applicant's deep and longstanding relationships in the U.S. mitigate any potential conflict of interest.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign Persons
AG ¶ 7(e)raisedShared Living Quarters with Foreign Persons

Mitigating

AG ¶ 8(b)appliedNo Conflict of Interest Due to Loyalty to the U.S.

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedAug 27, 2024
Answer filedSep 22, 2024
Hearing heldMay 20, 2025
Decision dateJul 10, 2025

Cite For

Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
Credibility of Applicant's Testimony Regarding Coercion
Importance of U.S. Citizenship and Loyalty in Security Clearance Decisions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant mitigated foreign influence security concerns related to his ties to Iraq. The applicant's strong allegiance to the United States and his credible testimony regarding his family's inability to coerce him were key factors in the decision to grant the security clearance.

Country conditions:the decision took administrative notice of official facts about the foreign country (the Government’s country submission).

U.S. ties the decision noted: Naturalized U.S. Citizen · U.S. Spouse or Partner · U.S. Children · U.S. Home or Property · U.S. Career or Business · Intent to Remain in U.S.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Relationship	Country	Response	Disqualifying (¶7)	Mitigating applied (¶8)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant mitigated the foreign influence security concerns.	For Applicant	Parent in Foreign Country Immediate Family	Iraq HEIGHTENED RISK	Unknown	—	(b) deep/longstanding U.S. loyalties; conflict resolves in favor of the U.S.	Claimed Other
1.b–1.h	7 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (for the applicant).	For Applicant	Unspecified Foreign Relationship Other	—		—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline B). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.