Summary
A 59-year-old senior engineer, originally from South Korea, was granted a security clearance after a review under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The applicant has resided in the U.S. for 30 years, is a naturalized citizen, and has held a security clearance for 20 years without incident.
The Statement of Reasons focused on his 86-year-old mother, an ethnic Japanese citizen living in South Korea, to whom he sends approximately $300 monthly. She identifies as Japanese and has no emotional ties to South Korea. In 2002, the applicant purchased an apartment in South Korea for his mother, valued at about $120,000, with his share being $50,000. This property has been for sale since 2006 and is currently rented to a third party, as his mother never moved in. The applicant has also made several trips to South Korea to visit his mother, most recently in May 2005.
The judge found that the applicant's strong ties to the U.S., his long history of integrity, and his mother's lack of influence mitigated security concerns. His mother's identification as Japanese and lack of emotional ties to South Korea were also noted as mitigating factors, leading to the granting of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- Applicant has lived in the U.S. for 30 years and is a naturalized citizen.
- His only foreign tie is an elderly mother in South Korea who identifies as Japanese and has no emotional ties to South Korea.
- The applicant has a long history of dedication and integrity in his work, with no reported issues during his 20 years of holding a security clearance.
Conditions Referenced
- DC 7(a)raisedContact with a Foreign Family MemberContact with the applicant's mother, a resident of South Korea, raised concerns of potential foreign influence.
- MC 8(a)appliedEvidence Mitigating Risk of Foreign InfluenceThe evidence supports the conclusion that it is unlikely the applicant will be placed in a position of having to choose between his mother's interests and those of the U.S.
Key Rule Quoted
“"any doubt as to whether access to classified information is clearly consistent with the interests of national security will be resolved in favor of the nation’s security."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 27, 2006
- Answer filedDec 11, 2006
- Hearing heldJul 30, 2007
- Decision dateAug 22, 2007
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Importance of Personal Ties to the U.S. in Security Clearance Decisions
- Consideration of the Applicant's Character and History in the Adjudication Process