Summary
A 53-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from a significant history of criminal offenses, including multiple DUIs and assault charges, which raised questions about his reliability and trustworthiness.
Specifically, the applicant had convictions for DUI in 1993, 2005 (with an escape charge), and again in 2005. He was also convicted of simple assault in 2009, and disorderly conduct in 2015, a lesser charge from an initial arrest for simple assault and harassment. Additionally, he was cited for two DUIs on the same day in June 2016, resulting in a conviction for one DUI and one charge of reckless driving. While he was arrested for contempt for violating a protective order in 2012, that case was dismissed.
The applicant also faced allegations of falsifying a Declaration for Federal Employment form (306) by denying current charges and past convictions. However, the adjudicator found his explanations for these omissions credible, mitigating some concerns related to false statements. Despite this, the extensive criminal history, particularly the repeated DUIs and assaults, led to the denial, as the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient rehabilitation or a sustained period without further criminal conduct.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant's criminal history included multiple DUIs and assaults, raising concerns about reliability and trustworthiness.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient rehabilitation or time without recurrence of criminal conduct.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.araisedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses Which Put the Safety of People at Risk or Threaten the Protection of Property or Information.
- E2.braisedCharges or Admission of Criminal Conduct Relating to the Safety of People and Proper Protection of Property or Information Systems.
- E2.eraisedActions Involving Violence or Sexual Behavior of a Criminal Nature That Poses an Unacceptable Risk If Access Is Granted to Federally-controlled Facilities and Federally-controlled Information Systems.
- E3.cappliedEvidence Has Been Supplied of Successful Rehabilitation, Including but Not Limited to Remorse or Restitution, Job Training or Higher Education, Good Employment Record, Constructive Community Involvement, or Passage of Time Without Recurrence.The applicant demonstrated genuine contrition and has a good work record.
- E3.arejectedThe Behavior Happened so Long Ago, Was Minor in Nature, or Happened Under Such Unusual Circumstances That It Is Unlikely to Recur.
- E3.brejectedThe Individual Has Acknowledged the Behavior and Has Taken Positive Steps to Mitigate the Risk.
Key Rule Quoted
“A CAC will not be issued to a person if there is a reasonable basis to believe, based on the individual’s criminal or dishonest conduct, that issuance of a CAC poses an unacceptable risk.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedApr 13, 2016
- Answer filedApr 30, 2016
- Hearing heldNov 16, 2016
- Decision dateMar 30, 2017
Cite For
- Denial of CAC Eligibility Due to a Pattern of Criminal Conduct Under Guideline E
- Mitigation of False Statement Concerns Under Guideline J
- Importance of Demonstrating Rehabilitation and Time Without Recurrence in Security Clearance Cases