Summary
This case involved a 41-year-old interpreter/translator for defense contractors whose eligibility for a security clearance was reviewed under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). Concerns arose from the applicant's family connections in the UAE and Iraq, as detailed in the Statement of Reasons.
Specifically, the applicant's mother, four brothers, and two sisters were identified as Iraqi citizens residing in the UAE, with two additional sisters and their husbands being UAE citizens and residents. The applicant also maintained contact with a childhood friend, a UAE citizen, resident, and officer in the UAE Air Force. The applicant admitted to traveling to the UAE in 2005 and 2007.
Despite these connections, the judge found that the applicant's family members were effectively stateless, having emigrated from Iraq to the UAE in 1974 and maintaining no current contact with Iraq. This, combined with the finding that the applicant's foreign contacts did not pose a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, led to the application of mitigating conditions. Ultimately, the applicant was granted eligibility for access to classified information.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant's family members are effectively stateless and have not been to Iraq since 1974.
- The applicant has no contact or connection to any persons currently in Iraq.
- The applicant's foreign contacts do not create a heightened risk of foreign exploitation.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with a Foreign Family Member, Business or Professional Associate, Friend, or Other Person Who Is a Citizen of or Resident in a Foreign Country If That Contact Creates a Heightened Risk of Foreign Exploitation, Inducement, Manipulation, Pressure, or Coercion
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to a Foreign Person, Group, Government, or Country That Create a Potential Conflict of Interest Between the Individual’s Obligation to Protect Sensitive Information or Technology and the Individual’s Desire to Help a Foreign Person, Group, or Country by Providing That Information
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedThe Individual’s Connections to the Foreign Country Are Not Sufficient to Create a Heightened Risk of Foreign Influence
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedThe Individual Has Not Engaged in Any Illegal Activity or Conduct That Would Raise Security Concerns
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMay 19, 2008
- Answer filedMay 27, 2008
- Hearing heldOct 9, 2008
- Decision dateOct 31, 2008
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Due to Family Status
- Consideration of the Totality of Foreign Contacts
- Impact of Statelessness on Security Clearance Decisions