Summary
A 41-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen and aerospace engineer, born in Taiwan, was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). The Statement of Reasons highlighted several issues, including the applicant's immediate family (father and two brothers) residing in Taiwan, and close bonds with his mother-in-law, father-in-law, and sister-in-law, who also live there. The applicant maintained regular contact with these relatives, and his mother-in-law lived with his family for part of each year.
Further concerns involved the applicant's substantial financial interests in Taiwan, such as real estate holdings, a bank account, and stock shares. His brother works for a private company contracting with the Taiwanese government, and his mother-in-law receives a Taiwanese retirement. Additionally, the applicant's wife has relatives living in Taiwan. The case also noted that the exercise of dual citizenship and possession of a foreign passport could indicate a disqualifying foreign preference.
Ultimately, the security clearance was granted. The applicant had renounced his Taiwanese citizenship and returned his passport, demonstrating a commitment to the U.S. The judge found that his extensive personal, professional, and economic ties to the United States mitigated potential security concerns. Crucially, none of the applicant's relatives in Taiwan were involved in intelligence gathering or deemed vulnerable to coercion, leading to the conclusion that his connections did not pose a security risk.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- Applicant renounced his Taiwanese citizenship and returned his passport, demonstrating a commitment to the U.S.
- He has extensive personal, professional, and economic ties to the United States, mitigating potential security concerns.
- None of the applicant's relatives in Taiwan are involved in intelligence gathering or are vulnerable to coercion.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A2.1.2.1appliedForeign Influence - Immediate Family Members
- E2.A3.1.2.2appliedForeign Preference - Possession of Foreign Passport
- E2.A3.1.2.3appliedForeign Preference - Military Service
- E2.A2.1.2.8appliedForeign Influence - Substantial Financial Interest
- E2.A3.1.3.1appliedForeign Preference - Dual Citizenship by Birth
- E2.A3.1.3.2appliedForeign Preference - Military Service Before U.S. Citizenship
- E2.A2.1.3.1appliedForeign Influence - Family Members Not Agents of Foreign Power
- E2.A2.1.3.2appliedForeign Influence - Limited Vulnerability to Foreign Influence
- E2.A3.1.3.4appliedForeign Preference - Willingness to Renounce Dual Citizenship
Key Rule Quoted
“The adjudicative process is an examination of a sufficient period of a person's life to make an affirmative determination that the person is eligible for a security clearance.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJan 28, 2004
- Answer filedMar 24, 2004
- Hearing heldOct 20, 2004via in-person hearing
- Decision dateJan 27, 2005
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Due to Family Ties in a Democratic Country
- Rebuttable Presumption of Foreign Preference Based on Dual Citizenship
- Consideration of the Whole Person Concept in Security Clearance Determinations.