Loading case…

Summary

A 23-year-old Electronics Technician, employed by a defense contractor, was denied a security clearance under Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from the applicant's conviction for Grand Theft embezzlement by an employee, a felony.

The applicant engaged in multiple fraudulent transactions, totaling $3,650.00, which led to the criminal charges. At the time of the security clearance decision, the applicant remained on probation for the conviction.

The judge determined that the applicant's actions demonstrated poor judgment and unreliability. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence presented to show rehabilitation or genuine remorse for the criminal conduct, leading to the denial of the security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

• The applicant engaged in criminal conduct involving multiple fraudulent transactions totaling $3,650.00.
• The applicant was convicted of Grand Theft embezzlement and remains on probation.
• There was no evidence of rehabilitation or genuine remorse for the criminal conduct.

Conditions Referenced

Key Rule Quoted

“Criminal Conduct reflects questionable judgment, unreliability, failure to control impulses, and increases the risk of unauthorized disclosure of classified information.”

Procedural Posture

• SOR issuedJun 25, 1997
• Answer filedJul 24, 1997Applicant elected to proceed without a hearing.
• Hearing held—Written record only.
• Decision dateJan 28, 1998

Cite For

• Criminal Conduct as a Basis for Security Clearance Denial
• Lack of Evidence for Rehabilitation or Remorse
• Impact of Recent Criminal Activity on Security Clearance Eligibility