Skip to content
← Decisions by country

Decisions by country · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Ties to Colombia in decided clearance cases

What the decided public record shows for cases in which ties to Colombia were alleged. Ties to any country are not themselves disqualifying, and every case turns on its own facts. This is decided history, not a prediction, and it says nothing about any nationality or community.

Decided cases

51

hearing-level decisions naming this country in the text

Granted

65%

33 granted · 18 denied or revoked

Ties living in the United States

at least 13

decisions stating expressly that the relative or contact lives in the United States, so this is a floor

The ties these cases involved

The kinds of relationship identified on Colombia allegations in these cases. A case can involve several, and the bars count cases rather than outcomes, so they carry no colour.
Parent in foreign country27 cases
Spouse dual or foreign citizen16 cases
Extended family in foreign country15 cases
Sibling in foreign country11 cases
Foreign real estate9 cases
In law in foreign country9 cases
Unspecified foreign relationship8 cases

Circumstances credited in granted cases

Circumstances the judge expressly credited among granted Colombia cases where that detail was extracted. Extraction covers a subset of the record, so these are raw counts and not rates.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 15 granted cases
  • severed foreign contact · credited in 2 granted cases
  • foreign assets divested · credited in 1 granted case
  • U.S. military service · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant in this case was a 42-year-old employee of a government contractor who applied for a security clearance. The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) addressed allegations under Gui…

  • The applicant in this case was a 28-year-old systems analyst employed by a defense contractor since August 2022. She was born in Colombia, became a U.S. citizen in March 2018, and had family members r…

  • The applicant in this case sought a security clearance but faced allegations under multiple adjudicative guidelines, specifically Guidelines D (Sexual Behavior), B (Foreign Influence), F (Financial Co…

  • The applicant in this case was a 67-year-old married man with a background in chemistry and a veteran of the Air Force National Guard. He faced security concerns under Guideline F (financial considera…

Search all Guideline B decisions mentioning Colombia

Other countries in the record

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose Guideline B allegations name this country. The country field is free text in the source, so the variants observed in the record are mapped onto one canonical name and nothing is guessed; records naming several countries in one field are excluded rather than split. A case naming two countries counts once under each. Counts of country risk and of ties living in the United States are counted only where the decision says so expressly, so both are floors. Pages exist only for countries with at least 25 decided cases.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.