Skip to content
← Decisions by country

Decisions by country · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Ties to Israel in decided clearance cases

What the decided public record shows for cases in which ties to Israel were alleged. Ties to any country are not themselves disqualifying, and every case turns on its own facts. This is decided history, not a prediction, and it says nothing about any nationality or community.

Decided cases

194

hearing-level decisions naming this country in the text

Granted

57%

110 granted · 84 denied or revoked

Ties living in the United States

at least 24

decisions stating expressly that the relative or contact lives in the United States, so this is a floor

The ties these cases involved

The kinds of relationship identified on Israel allegations in these cases. A case can involve several, and the bars count cases rather than outcomes, so they carry no colour.
Parent in foreign country100 cases
Sibling in foreign country90 cases
Unspecified foreign relationship76 cases
Extended family in foreign country46 cases
Spouse dual or foreign citizen42 cases
In law in foreign country38 cases
Friend in foreign country36 cases

Circumstances credited in granted cases

Circumstances the judge expressly credited among granted Israel cases where that detail was extracted. Extraction covers a subset of the record, so these are raw counts and not rates.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 37 granted cases
  • severed foreign contact · credited in 4 granted cases
  • foreign assets divested · credited in 3 granted cases
  • foreign passport surrendered · credited in 2 granted cases
  • contact disclosed to authorities · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • Applicant, an engineer and former IDF service member, was denied allegations under Guideline B for foreign influence based on family, property, and financial ties to Israel. He admitted the SOR, but t…

  • On remand, the judge again granted Applicant eligibility under Guideline B. The decision centered on Applicant’s sister and brother-in-law in Israel, both dual nationals with prior IDF service. The ju…

  • The case involves security concerns under multiple guidelines, including criminal conduct, alcohol consumption, personal conduct, foreign influence, and financial considerations. The applicant admitte…

  • Applicant, a dual Belgian-American citizen and scientist for a defense contractor, was denied eligibility for a security clearance. The judge found mitigating evidence sufficient for Guideline B, invo…

Search all Guideline B decisions mentioning Israel

Other countries in the record

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose Guideline B allegations name this country. The country field is free text in the source, so the variants observed in the record are mapped onto one canonical name and nothing is guessed; records naming several countries in one field are excluded rather than split. A case naming two countries counts once under each. Counts of country risk and of ties living in the United States are counted only where the decision says so expressly, so both are floors. Pages exist only for countries with at least 25 decided cases.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.