Skip to content
← Decisions by country

Decisions by country · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Ties to Thailand in decided clearance cases

What the decided public record shows for cases in which ties to Thailand were alleged. Ties to any country are not themselves disqualifying, and every case turns on its own facts. This is decided history, not a prediction, and it says nothing about any nationality or community.

Decided cases

39

hearing-level decisions naming this country in the text

Granted

46%

18 granted · 21 denied or revoked

Ties living in the United States

at least 9

decisions stating expressly that the relative or contact lives in the United States, so this is a floor

The ties these cases involved

The kinds of relationship identified on Thailand allegations in these cases. A case can involve several, and the bars count cases rather than outcomes, so they carry no colour.
Spouse dual or foreign citizen17 cases
Parent in foreign country16 cases
Unspecified foreign relationship14 cases
In law in foreign country10 cases
Extended family in foreign country7 cases
Sibling in foreign country6 cases
Foreign bank account or investment5 cases

Circumstances credited in granted cases

Circumstances the judge expressly credited among granted Thailand cases where that detail was extracted. Extraction covers a subset of the record, so these are raw counts and not rates.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 5 granted cases
  • foreign assets divested · credited in 1 granted case
  • voluntary disclosure before confrontation · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant in this case was a 29-year-old aviation mechanic employed by a defense contractor, who had previously served in the U.S. Navy. The Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Statement of Reaso…

  • The applicant in this case was a 59-year-old Test Engineer with a defense contractor, who had served honorably in the U.S. Navy for over twenty years. The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)…

  • The applicant in this case was a 63-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought to retain his security clearance, which he had held since approximately 2010. The Department of Defense issued …

  • The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old male who had served in the U.S. Air Force from 1985 to 1996 and was employed by a government contractor at the time of his security clearance application. …

Search all Guideline B decisions mentioning Thailand

Other countries in the record

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose Guideline B allegations name this country. The country field is free text in the source, so the variants observed in the record are mapped onto one canonical name and nothing is guessed; records naming several countries in one field are excluded rather than split. A case naming two countries counts once under each. Counts of country risk and of ties living in the United States are counted only where the decision says so expressly, so both are floors. Pages exist only for countries with at least 25 decided cases.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.