Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline K · Handling Protected Info
Cross-Domain (Spillage) Violation
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.
Decided cases
27
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
37%
10 granted · 17 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions in play
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 35(a) | 7 | 0 |
| ¶ 35(b) | 6 | 0 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 04-04264.a2 granted · 2007The applicant in this case was a senior software engineer for a defense contractor who faced security concerns under Guideline K (Security Violations) of Department of Defense Directive 5220.6. The al…
- ISCR 21-01308 granted · 2024The applicant in this case was a 55-year-old senior director for business development at a defense contractor, with a military background as a retired Colonel. The Defense Counterintelligence and Secu…
- ISCR 20-00570 denied · 2022The applicant in this case sought renewed eligibility for a security clearance and faced allegations under multiple adjudicative guidelines, including Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption), Guideline J (C…
- ISCR 22-00982 denied · 2023Applicant, a 30-year-old male with over seven years of service in the U.S. Navy, applied for a security clearance on March 17, 2021. The Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility issue…
Related issues under Guideline K
- Failure to Safeguard or Secure · 156 cases
- Unspecified Information Handling Failure · 114 cases
- Unauthorized Disclosure · 76 cases
- Removed Classified Info to Personal Space · 37 cases
Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.