Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline K · Handling Protected Info
Cross-Domain (Spillage) Violation
What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.
Decided cases
27
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
37%
10 granted · 17 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions cited
The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are numbers of cases, not rates. Read what each condition says.
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 35(a) | 7 | 0 |
| ¶ 35(b) | 6 | 0 |
Recent decided examples
- ISCR 04-04264.a2 granted · 2007The applicant in this case was a senior software engineer for a defense contractor who faced security concerns under Guideline K (Security Violations) of Department of Defense Directive 5220.6. The al…
- ISCR 21-01308 granted · 2024The applicant in this case was a 55-year-old senior director for business development at a defense contractor, with a military background as a retired Colonel. The Defense Counterintelligence and Secu…
- ISCR 20-00570 denied · 2022The applicant in this case sought renewed eligibility for a security clearance and faced allegations under multiple adjudicative guidelines, including Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption), Guideline J (C…
- ISCR 22-00982 denied · 2023Applicant, a 30-year-old male with over seven years of service in the U.S. Navy, applied for a security clearance on March 17, 2021. The Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility issue…
Related issues under Guideline K
- Failure to Safeguard or Secure · 157 cases
- Unspecified Information Handling Failure · 114 cases
- Unauthorized Disclosure · 75 cases
- Removed Classified Info to Personal Space · 37 cases
For questions about how this issue has been treated on particular facts, the assistant searches the record, and the CASE Prep service provides a written, human-reviewed response. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.