CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 19-01889 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 19-01889

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date1/31/2020
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeADP POSITION
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Elizabeth M. Matchinski
Government Counsel: Tara R. Karoian
Case Summary
The applicant in this case sought a public trust position but faced allegations under Guideline H concerning drug involvement and substance misuse. The Statement of Reasons (SOR) indicated that the applicant had used marijuana from October 2012 through at least July 2019, with her use being medically authorized since October 2016. However, the SOR noted that her drug use violated federal law and Department of Defense (DOD) policy, leading to concerns about her trustworthiness.
The applicant admitted to using marijuana and possessing a medical marijuana card, which she intended to continue using for her medical conditions. She acknowledged a prior arrest in December 2015 for possession of cannabis and drug paraphernalia, although she claimed the paraphernalia charge was dismissed. Despite her assertions of using marijuana for medical purposes, the administrative judge found that her continued use, even with a medical card, remained in violation of federal law, which classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, denying her eligibility for the public trust position. The judge concluded that the applicant's ongoing use of marijuana, her admission of intent to continue its use, and the violation of federal law raised significant concerns about her reliability and trustworthiness. The decision emphasized that the applicant's disregard for federal law regarding drug use was a critical factor in determining her unsuitability for the position.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline HDrug Involvement & Substance Misuse · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 19-01889

deniedJan 31, 2020· Hon. Elizabeth M. Matchinski· hearing

Summary

A 29-year-old female applicant was denied eligibility for a public trust position due to drug involvement under Guideline H. The Statement of Reasons alleged that the applicant used medical cannabis with varying frequency from approximately October 2012 to July 2019.

The denial was based on the applicant's ongoing marijuana use, which violated federal law and Department of Defense policy. Disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guideline Paragraphs 25(a), 25(c), and 25(g) were raised.

The judge determined that the applicant intended to continue daily marijuana use for medical purposes and found no applicable mitigating factors to offset the security concerns. Consequently, the applicant's eligibility was denied.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant's marijuana use violated federal law and DOD policy.
The applicant intended to continue using marijuana daily for medical purposes.
No mitigating factors were established to counter the disqualifying conditions.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 25(a)raisedAny Substance Misuse
AG ¶ 25(c)raisedIllegal Possession of a Controlled Substance
AG ¶ 25(g)raisedExpressed Intent to Continue Drug Involvement

Key Rule Quoted

“The illegal use of controlled substances...can raise questions about an individual’s reliability and trustworthiness.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJul 26, 2019
Answer filedAug 6, 2019Requested decision based on written record.
Hearing held—Decision made based on written record.
Decision dateJan 31, 2020

Cite For

Denial of Eligibility Due to Ongoing Drug Use Under Guideline H
Impact of Federal Law on State-sanctioned Medical Marijuana Use
Lack of Mitigating Factors in Drug Involvement Cases

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline H (Drug Involvement) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to drug involvement, specifically the use of medical cannabis from October 2012 to July 2019. The applicant admitted to the use and possession of medical cannabis and expressed an intention to continue its use, which contributed to the denial of her eligibility for a public trust position.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Substance / event	Use level	Response	Disqualifying (¶25)	Mitigating applied (¶26)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant used medical cannabis with varying frequency from about October 2012 to July 2019.	Against Applicant	Marijuana	Frequent	Admitted	(a) any substance misuse (c) illegal possession, cultivation, manufacture, purchase, sale, or distribution; or paraphernalia (g) expressed intent to continue, or failure to commit to discontinue	—	—
1.b–1.d	3 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant).	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Unspecified		—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline H). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.