CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 19-02348 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 19-02348

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date6/18/2020
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Elizabeth M. Matchinski
Government Counsel: Carroll J. Connelley
Case Summary
Applicant in this case was a 40-year-old task manager employed by a defense contractor, seeking security clearance eligibility. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations. The SOR detailed approximately $31,125 in delinquent credit-card debts and loans, which the applicant attributed to financial difficulties stemming from a divorce in 2009 and a fire in 2018 that resulted in significant losses.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the debts outlined in the SOR and explained that they were incurred due to various personal circumstances, including legal fees, child support obligations, and the aftermath of the fire. He indicated that he had made some progress in settling other debts and was in the process of negotiating repayment terms for the debts listed in the SOR. However, the administrative judge found that the applicant had not been sufficiently proactive in addressing his financial delinquencies.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled to deny the applicant's security clearance eligibility. The judge concluded that while the applicant had made some efforts to resolve his debts, the overall lack of timely action and the significant amount of outstanding debt raised concerns about his reliability and financial responsibility, which were deemed inconsistent with the national interest.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 19-02348

deniedJun 18, 2020· Hon. Elizabeth M. Matchinski· hearing

Summary

A 40-year-old task manager with military service was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to unresolved financial issues. The applicant had over $32,000 in credit card debts, and while one debt was settled, the judge determined that insufficient progress had been made in addressing the overall financial obligations.

Disqualifying conditions included the applicant's history of not meeting financial obligations and an inability or unwillingness to satisfy debts. Although mitigating conditions were considered, such as the debts not being recent and the financial problems being largely beyond the applicant's control, these were not sufficient to overcome the security concerns.

The denial was based on the applicant's failure to demonstrate sufficient progress in resolving the significant credit card debts and a lack of responsible debt management. The ongoing and unresolved financial issues raised concerns about the applicant's reliability and judgment, leading to the conclusion that granting clearance was not consistent with national interest.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient progress in addressing significant credit card debts totaling over $32,000.
The applicant did not act responsibly in managing his debts, despite personal circumstances contributing to his financial distress.
The applicant's financial issues were ongoing and unresolved, raising concerns about his reliability and judgment.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)appliedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe applicant's divorce and a fire that destroyed his belongings contributed to his financial problems.
AG ¶ 20(d)rejectedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsThe applicant's efforts to resolve debts were insufficient and not timely.

Key Rule Quoted

“An applicant is not required to be debt free, but is required to manage his finances in a way as to exhibit sound judgment and responsibility.”
— ISCR Case No. 11-05365 at 3 (App. Bd. May 1, 2012)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedSep 24, 2019
Answer filedOct 15, 2019
Hearing heldMar 6, 2020
Decision dateJun 18, 2020

Cite For

Financial Responsibility Under Guideline F
Impact of Unresolved Debts on Security Clearance Eligibility
Consideration of Personal Circumstances in Financial Distress Cases

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.