CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 19-03671 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 19-03671

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date7/8/2021
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Arthur E. Marshall, Jr.
Government Counsel: David F. Hayes
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 42-year-old install technician who faced security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to multiple delinquent debts, primarily related to federal student loans. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) on April 24, 2020, detailing these financial issues. The applicant admitted to all but one of the allegations, specifically denying knowledge of a medical debt.
The administrative judge found that the applicant had a history of financial difficulties stemming from various factors, including insufficient income, the need to support his ailing parents, and confusion regarding the status of his student loans. He had initially made timely payments to his school but struggled with federal loan payments after graduation. The applicant sought assistance from various organizations to manage his debts and ultimately enrolled in a government-approved repayment program. He demonstrated a commitment to resolving his financial obligations and was relieved of payments during the pandemic.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that the financial concerns were mitigated. The judge noted that the applicant's circumstances were largely beyond his control and that he had taken responsible steps to address his debts. The decision emphasized the applicant's credible testimony and proactive measures to manage his financial situation, ultimately determining that granting him a security clearance was consistent with national interest.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 19-03671

grantedJul 8, 2021· Hon. Arthur E. Marshall, Jr.· hearing

Summary

A 42-year-old install technician was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant admitted to most allegations regarding his student loans but denied knowledge of a $639 medical debt. Disqualifying conditions under AG ¶ 19(a) and AG ¶ 19(c) were initially raised.

However, the applicant successfully demonstrated that his financial difficulties were largely due to circumstances beyond his control, including caring for ill parents and confusion surrounding his student loan obligations. He actively sought financial counseling and enrolled in a repayment program to address these debts.

The decision to grant the clearance was based on the application of mitigating conditions AG ¶ 20(b), AG ¶ 20(c), and AG ¶ 20(d). The applicant's credible testimony and proactive steps to resolve his financial issues indicated a good-faith effort, leading to a favorable outcome.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant demonstrated that his financial difficulties were largely due to circumstances beyond his control, including caring for ill parents and confusion regarding his student loans.
He actively sought financial counseling and enrolled in a repayment program to address his student loan obligations.
The applicant's credible testimony and actions indicated a good-faith effort to resolve his financial issues.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Beyond Control
AG ¶ 20(c)appliedReceiving Financial Counseling
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Debts

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedApr 24, 2020
Answer filed—
Hearing heldMar 24, 2021
Decision dateJul 8, 2021

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Concerns Under Guideline F Due to Circumstances Beyond Control
Importance of Credible Testimony in Financial Cases
Good-faith Efforts to Resolve Debts as a Mitigating Factor

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant mitigated financial concerns related to his student loans totaling approximately $35,000, which he admitted. The applicant denied knowledge of a medical debt for $639, which the judge did not find against him, leading to a decision to grant the security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans but denied knowledge of a medical debt for $639. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other
1.b	Applicant denied knowledge of a medical debt for $639. $639	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.c	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other
1.d	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other
1.e	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other
1.f	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other
1.g	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other
1.h	Applicant admitted all allegations related to his student loans. $35,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.