CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 19-03881 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 19-03881

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date4/9/2021
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Noreen A. Lynch
Government Counsel: Allison Marie
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 30-year-old individual who served in the U.S. Air Force from 2008 to 2012 and had been employed since 2017. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Adjudicative Guideline F (financial considerations), specifically alleging 13 delinquent debts totaling $31,349. The applicant admitted to most of the debts but attributed them to financial difficulties stemming from his military service, a divorce, and periods of underemployment.
In his response to the SOR, the applicant provided some explanations and claimed to have initiated payment plans for a few debts, although he did not submit sufficient documentation to support these claims. He acknowledged his financial irresponsibility in the past and expressed a desire to improve his situation, stating a plan to pay off his debts within five years. However, the administrative judge found that the applicant failed to demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve his financial issues, as there was little evidence of consistent payments or effective management of his debts.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that the applicant had not mitigated the security concerns related to his financial situation. The judge emphasized that any doubts regarding the applicant's eligibility for a security clearance must be resolved in favor of national security, leading to the denial of the applicant's request for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 19-03881

deniedApr 9, 2021· Hon. Noreen A. Lynch· hearing

Summary

A 30-year-old former U.S. Air Force member was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to unresolved financial issues. The Statement of Reasons cited 13 delinquent debts totaling $31,349, encompassing consumer, automobile, utility, and medical obligations. The applicant was alleged to have failed to satisfy these debts and meet financial obligations, demonstrating a history of such issues.

While the applicant admitted to some debts and made efforts to contact creditors and arrange payment plans for certain accounts, he did not provide sufficient documentation to support these claims or demonstrate overall financial responsibility. Personal circumstances, including divorce and unemployment, were noted as exacerbating his financial distress. However, there was no evidence of ongoing financial counseling or effective debt management.

Ultimately, the applicant failed to meet his burden of proof regarding financial responsibility. The lack of documentation and the overall financial situation raised significant questions about his reliability and trustworthiness, leading to the denial of his security clearance. Disqualifying conditions under AG ¶ 19(a) and AG ¶ 19(c) were raised, while mitigating conditions under AG ¶ 20(d) and AG ¶ 20(c) were applied.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant did not present documentation to support his burden of proof regarding financial responsibility.
The applicant's financial situation raised significant questions about his reliability and trustworthiness.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(d)rejectedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsThe applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve his debts.
AG ¶ 20(c)rejectedReceived Financial CounselingThe applicant did not provide evidence of receiving financial counseling from a legitimate source.

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedFeb 18, 2020
Answer filed—Applicant elected to have the case decided on the written record.
Hearing held—Decision based on documentary evidence.
Decision dateApr 9, 2021

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Unresolved Financial Issues Under Guideline F
Insufficient Documentation to Demonstrate Financial Responsibility
Questions About Reliability and Trustworthiness Due to Financial Distress

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including significant delinquent debts totaling $31,349, and a history of not meeting financial obligations. Despite some efforts to address these debts, the overall financial situation raised doubts about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness, leading to a decision against the applicant.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Delinquent debts totaling $31,349 including consumer, automobile, utility, and medical debts. $31,349	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.b	Failure to satisfy debts and meet financial obligations. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.c	Some debts have been paid or are in payment plans. $0	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	Claimed Debt Paid in Full
1.d	Applicant has made efforts to contact creditors and arrange payment plans for some debts. $0	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	Claimed Debt Settlement
1.e	Failure to provide sufficient evidence of financial responsibility. $0	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.f	History of not meeting financial obligations. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.g	Financial distress exacerbated by personal circumstances such as divorce and unemployment. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.h	Lack of sufficient documentation to support claims of financial responsibility. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.i	No evidence of ongoing financial counseling or effective debt management. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.j	Concerns about reliability and trustworthiness due to financial irresponsibility. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.k	Potential risk of engaging in illegal acts due to financial distress. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.l	Overall financial situation raises questions about ability to protect classified information. $0	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.