CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 08-10204 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 08-10204

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date10/6/2009
Statusunknown
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionsSee the appeal decision (Case 08-10204.a2) →See the hearing decision (Case 08-10204.h2) →See the hearing decision (Case 08-10204.a1) →See the hearing decision (Case 08-10204.h1) →
Participants
Judge: Michael Y. Ra'anan, Michael D. Hipple, James E. Moody
Government Counsel: James B. Norman
Case Summary
The applicant in this case sought a security clearance but was denied due to concerns related to financial considerations, specifically under Guideline F of the Department of Defense Directive 5220.6. The Statement of Reasons issued on December 30, 2008, outlined the basis for the denial, which included allegations of financial instability and unresolved debts.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to having financial difficulties but contended that he was actively working to resolve these issues. He requested a decision based on the administrative record, and after a hearing, Administrative Judge Juan J. Rivera denied the security clearance on July 23, 2009. Following this decision, the applicant filed an appeal, presenting new evidence that suggested some documentation may not have been considered by the Judge.
The Appeal Board, recognizing the potential oversight, decided to remand the case for further processing to ensure that all pertinent evidence was reviewed. The Board's decision emphasized the importance of administrative economy and fairness in the adjudication process, allowing the applicant another opportunity to present his case without prejudice to the rights of either party.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 08-10204

unknownOct 6, 2009· Hon. Michael Y. Ra'anan· hearing

Summary

This case involves an applicant, represented by counsel, whose security clearance was initially denied by the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) under Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The applicant appealed this decision.

The Appeal Board reviewed the case and determined that new evidence, which had not been considered by the Administrative Judge during the initial adjudication, was pertinent. To ensure a fair and thorough review of all relevant information, the Appeal Board remanded the case for further processing.

This remand was considered an equitable resolution, allowing for the proper consideration of the new evidence. As of this decision, there is no final outcome regarding the applicant's security clearance.

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedDec 30, 2008
Answer filed—
Hearing heldJul 23, 2009Administrative Judge denied security clearance
Decision dateOct 6, 2009Appeal Board remanded case

Cite For

Remand Due to New Evidence Not Considered by the Administrative Judge
Equitable Resolution in Security Clearance Cases
Importance of Reviewing All Pertinent Evidence in Security Clearance Decisions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.