CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 20-02970 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 20-02970

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date12/13/2022
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Judge: Marc E. Curry
Government Counsel: Raashid S. Williams
Applicant's Counsel: Troy L. Nussbaum
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 52-year-old married man with a bachelor's degree in information technology, employed for 12 years by a defense contractor. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations, due to the applicant's failure to file federal and state income tax returns from 2014 to 2018 and his delinquent mortgage and credit card payments. The applicant denied most allegations but acknowledged the failure to file tax returns and indicated that financial issues stemmed from his wife's mismanagement of their finances during a period of personal and professional stress.
The administrative judge found that the applicant had taken significant steps to address his financial issues, including filing delinquent tax returns and working with an accountant to establish a payment plan for his tax liabilities. The applicant's mortgage and home equity line of credit were current at the time of the hearing, and he had resolved a small credit card debt. The judge noted the applicant's proactive measures, including retaining a financial counselor and improving communication with his wife regarding their finances, which contributed to a more stable financial situation.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, granting him a security clearance. The decision was based on the conclusion that the applicant's financial problems were being resolved and were under control, thus not posing a risk to national security. The judge emphasized the importance of the applicant's efforts to rectify past issues and the positive changes in his financial management practices.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 20-02970

grantedDec 13, 2022· Hon. Marc E. Curry· hearing

Summary

This case concerns a 52-year-old defense contractor whose security clearance eligibility was reviewed under Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The Statement of Reasons alleged several financial issues, including delinquencies on a mortgage loan and a home equity line of credit, as well as the failure to file federal and state income tax returns for the years 2014 through 2018. Additionally, the applicant and their spouse had a credit card debt of $385, which was paid in a lump sum.

Disqualifying conditions under Guideline F were raised, but the judge applied several mitigating conditions. At the time of the hearing, the applicant's mortgage and home equity line of credit payments were current. All delinquent tax returns had been filed, and the applicant was actively working with an accountant to manage ongoing tax obligations.

The judge found that the applicant demonstrated a proactive approach to resolving financial issues, including working with a financial counselor. Based on these mitigating actions, the judge concluded that the security concerns were resolved, and eligibility for a security clearance was GRANTED.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant's mortgage and home equity line of credit payments were current at the time of the hearing.
The applicant filed all delinquent tax returns and was working with an accountant to manage tax obligations.
The applicant demonstrated a proactive approach to resolving financial issues, including working with a financial counselor.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns or Failure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)rejectedConditions Beyond the Person's ControlThe applicant's wife's mismanagement of finances did not constitute a circumstance beyond his control.
AG ¶ 20(c)appliedReceiving Financial Counseling
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Debts
AG ¶ 20(g)appliedArrangements with Tax Authority

Key Rule Quoted

“Security clearance determinations are not intended to punish applicants for past shortcomings.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedFeb 3, 2021
Answer filedMar 19, 2021
Hearing heldOct 4, 2022Hearing rescheduled due to applicant's medical condition.
Decision dateDec 13, 2022

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Issues Under Guideline F
Proactive Measures in Resolving Tax Delinquencies
Impact of Personal Circumstances on Financial Management

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant's financial issues, including a history of unpaid taxes and a credit card debt, were being resolved. The applicant demonstrated efforts to address these concerns, leading to a decision in favor of granting the security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant and his wife fell behind on their mortgage loan and their home equity line of credit.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	—
1.b	Applicant and his wife failed to file their federal and state income tax returns for 2014 through 2018.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations (f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	(c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	—
1.c	Applicant and his wife had a credit card debt totaling $385 that was paid in a lump sum. $385	For Applicant	Credit Card Debt	Admitted	—	—	—
1.d	Applicant and his wife failed to file their federal income tax returns for 2014 through 2018.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations (f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	(c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	—
1.e	Applicant and his wife failed to file their federal income tax returns for 2014 through 2018.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations (f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	(c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	—
1.f	Applicant and his wife failed to file their federal income tax returns for 2014 through 2018.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations (f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	(c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved (g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.