CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-01688 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 21-01688

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/14/2023
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionsSee the appeal decision (Case 21-01688) →See the hearing decision (Case 21-01688) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Robert Robinson Gales
Government Counsel: Tara R. Karoian
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 47-year-old employee of a defense contractor who applied for a security clearance in April 2020. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) on December 3, 2021, citing security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The SOR detailed allegations of financial difficulties, including a history of delinquent accounts and a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filed in 2008, which was discharged in 2013.
The applicant admitted to the allegations in the SOR, acknowledging issues with multiple student loans totaling approximately $101,248 and a charge account with an unpaid balance of $2,167. He provided some context regarding his financial situation, including payments made towards his debts and the impact of attending ITT Technical Institute, a school that faced legal challenges related to predatory lending practices. Despite his admissions, the applicant had made efforts to address his financial obligations, including resolving one charge account and making payments on his student loans.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that he had mitigated the security concerns related to his financial issues. The judge noted the applicant's proactive steps to manage his debts and the broader context of the financial difficulties stemming from his education at ITT Technical Institute, which had been involved in significant legal settlements regarding student loans. As a result, the applicant was granted eligibility for a security clearance.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-01688

grantedMar 14, 2023· Hon. Robert Robinson Gales· hearing

Summary

A 47-year-old defense contractor employee was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons cited a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, filed in April 2008 and discharged around July 2013, and 15 delinquent accounts. These included 14 student loans totaling approximately $101,248 and one unpaid charge account of $2,167.

The administrative judge determined that the applicant's financial difficulties were largely attributable to predatory lending practices by ITT Technical Institute. The applicant demonstrated a good-faith effort to manage his debts, including resolving a significant charge account.

Crucially, the applicant's current financial situation is stable, with no delinquent accounts reported. These mitigating factors, specifically that the issues were largely beyond the applicant's control and that he had taken steps to resolve them, led to the decision to grant the security clearance eligibility.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant's financial issues were largely due to predatory lending practices from ITT Technical Institute.
The applicant's current financial situation is stable with no delinquent accounts as of the latest credit report.
The applicant resolved a significant charge account and demonstrated a good-faith effort to manage his debts.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)appliedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions That Resulted in Financial Problems Were Largely Beyond the Person's Control
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedIndividual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors
AG ¶ 20(e)appliedIndividual Has a Reasonable Basis to Dispute the Legitimacy of the Past-due Debt

Key Rule Quoted

“Eligibility for access to classified information is granted.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedDec 3, 2021
Answer filedFeb 26, 2022Applicant elected to have the case decided on the written record.
Hearing heldMar 14, 2023Remand decision issued.
Decision dateMar 14, 2023

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Issues Due to Predatory Lending Under Guideline F
Stability of Financial Situation as a Basis for Granting Security Clearance
Impact of Consumer Fraud on Financial Obligations and Security Clearance Eligibility

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant mitigated the financial concerns under Guideline F, including a Chapter 13 bankruptcy that was discharged in 2013 and the resolution of previously delinquent student loans. The applicant's financial situation was deemed consistent with the national interest, leading to a favorable decision for the applicant.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant mitigated the security concerns regarding financial considerations.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.b	Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in April 2008, which was discharged in about July 2013.	For Applicant	Bankruptcy Filing	Admitted	—	—	—
1.c	The SOR alleged 15 still-delinquent accounts, of which the 14 student loans totaled approximately $101,248, and the remaining unpaid charge account totaled $2,167.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Debt Paid in Full

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.