CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-02717 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 21-02717

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date9/29/2023
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Braden M. Murphy
Government Counsel: David F. Hayes
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 36-year-old individual who had experienced financial difficulties due to employment instability affecting both him and his wife. The Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations, specifically alleging that the applicant had delinquent federal student loans totaling $29,614 and other debts. The applicant admitted to some debts but denied that his student loans were delinquent, asserting that they were in forbearance and had been rehabilitated.
The administrative judge found that the applicant had made significant efforts to address his financial situation. He had been employed in the defense industry since February 2022, earning a substantial income, and had taken on a second job to pay down credit card debt. The judge noted that the applicant's student loans were now in good standing, and he had documented savings and no other significant delinquencies. The applicant acknowledged past poor financial decisions but demonstrated a commitment to improving his financial health.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, granting eligibility for access to classified information. The judge concluded that the applicant had mitigated the financial considerations security concern by demonstrating responsible behavior, including a good-faith effort to repay debts and a stable financial situation, which indicated reliability and trustworthiness.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-02717

grantedSep 29, 2023· Hon. Braden M. Murphy· hearing

Summary

A 36-year-old male applicant was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons alleged that his federal student loans were delinquent for several years due to employment instability experienced by both him and his wife. Additionally, a bank account had been charged off, and a phone company account was placed for collection. These issues raised disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines Paragraphs 19(a) and 19(c).

However, the judge found that the applicant had successfully mitigated these financial concerns. His federal student loans are now current and in forbearance, and he has demonstrated a proactive approach to managing his debts, including obtaining a second job. The applicant has no other significant delinquencies and possesses ample income to address his financial obligations.

The judge applied mitigating conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines Paragraphs 20(b) and 20(d), concluding that the applicant had resolved the financial issues and stabilized his situation. Consequently, the security clearance was granted.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant's federal student loans are now current and in forbearance.
He has demonstrated a proactive approach to managing his debts, including obtaining a second job.
The applicant has no other significant delinquencies and has ample income to address his debts.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe applicant's financial issues were due to employment instability and his wife's job loss.
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsThe applicant has taken steps to rehabilitate his loans and has maintained a good income.

Key Rule Quoted

“The clearly consistent standard indicates that security determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
— Department of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 531 (1988)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedApr 5, 2022
Answer filedApr 5, 2022Requested a hearing.
Hearing heldJul 27, 2023Conducted via video teleconference.
Decision dateSep 29, 2023

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Concerns Under Guideline F
Proactive Measures in Addressing Debts
Impact of Employment Instability on Financial Obligations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant's financial issues stemmed from employment instability and that he has taken steps to address his debts, including making payments and entering into agreements with creditors. Ultimately, the judge ruled in favor of the applicant on all financial allegations, concluding that he is eligible for a security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant's federal student loans were delinquent for several years after he and his wife experienced employment instability. $10,262	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Denied	—	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved	—
1.b	Applicant's federal student loans were delinquent for several years after he and his wife experienced employment instability. $10,193	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Denied	—	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved	—
1.c	Applicant's federal student loans were delinquent for several years after he and his wife experienced employment instability. $4,744	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Denied	—	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved	—
1.d	Applicant's federal student loans were delinquent for several years after he and his wife experienced employment instability. $4,415	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Denied	—	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (c) received/receiving counseling; problem being resolved	—
1.e	An account that was charged off by a bank. $274	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.f	An account placed for collection by a phone company. $688	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.