CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-00829 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 22-00829

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/16/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Braden M. Murphy
Government Counsel: Brittany C. M. White
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 55-year-old woman with a background in the U.S. Air Force Reserve and experience in the defense industry. She applied for a security clearance in January 2020 but faced allegations under Guideline F, concerning financial considerations, due to unpaid federal student loans, past-due federal income taxes, and unfiled tax returns. The Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility issued a Statement of Reasons in September 2022, citing over $80,000 in delinquent debts.
In her response to the allegations, the applicant admitted to most of the debts but provided limited explanations for her financial difficulties, attributing them to underemployment and medical expenses following her retirement from active duty. She acknowledged that her federal student loans were in delinquent status and that she had not filed her 2018 and 2019 tax returns. Despite her claims of being on a payment plan for her student loans, she did not provide sufficient documentation to support her assertions or to demonstrate any recent efforts to address her financial issues.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that she failed to mitigate the financial security concerns. The judge noted the lack of evidence regarding her current financial situation and the absence of documentation to support her claims of debt forgiveness or repayment plans. The decision emphasized the importance of financial responsibility in maintaining national security eligibility, ultimately denying her access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-00829

deniedAug 16, 2023· Hon. Braden M. Murphy· hearing

Summary

A 55-year-old female applicant, with a U.S. Air Force Reserve background, was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to significant financial issues. The Statement of Reasons cited approximately $76,000 in unpaid federal student loans, about $4,000 in medical and other past-due debts, and roughly $4,700 in past-due federal income taxes. Additionally, the applicant failed to file her 2018 and 2019 state and federal income tax returns on time.

The judge determined that these financial issues raised doubts about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness for access to classified information. Disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines Paragraphs 19(a), 19(c), and 19(f) were specifically noted.

The denial was based on the applicant's substantial unpaid federal student loans, her past-due federal income taxes, and her unfiled tax returns for 2018 and 2019. The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to mitigate these financial security concerns, leading to the ultimate denial of her security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant had significant unpaid federal student loans totaling approximately $76,000.
The applicant had past-due federal income taxes and unfiled tax returns for 2018 and 2019.
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to mitigate the financial security concerns.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns or Failure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required

Key Rule Quoted

“the clearly consistent standard indicates that security determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
— Department of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 531 (1988)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedSep 29, 2022
Answer filedDec 30, 2022
Hearing held—Applicant requested a decision based on the written record.
Decision dateAug 16, 2023

Cite For

Financial Irresponsibility as a Disqualifying Factor Under Guideline F
Failure to Mitigate Financial Security Concerns
Importance of Providing Evidence of Financial Responsibility in Security Clearance Cases

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found significant financial concerns under Guideline F, including unpaid federal student loans, past-due medical debts, and unfiled income tax returns. The applicant's failure to demonstrate good faith in addressing these debts led to a decision against her eligibility for clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant has unpaid federal student loans of about $76,000. $76,000	Against Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	—	—	—
1.n	Applicant has about $4,000 in medical and other past-due debts. $4,000	Against Applicant	Medical Debt	Admitted	—	—	—
1.u	Applicant has about $4,700 in past-due federal income taxes. $4,700	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	—
1.w	Applicant failed to file her 2018 and 2019 state and federal income tax returns on time.	Against Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.