CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-02112 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 21-02112

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date1/30/2024
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Marc E. Curry
Government Counsel: Mark D. Lawton
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 38-year-old single mother of two children, who faced financial difficulties primarily due to delinquent student loans and commercial debts. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations, which included the applicant's inability to satisfy debts and a history of not meeting financial obligations. The applicant admitted to some debts but contended that many were the result of identity theft perpetrated by her ex-boyfriend.
The administrative judge found that the applicant had taken significant steps to address her financial issues. She successfully renegotiated her student loan payments, which were reduced to a manageable amount, and she had been making timely payments since. The applicant also reported her ex-boyfriend's fraudulent activities, worked with an attorney to remove the fraudulent debts from her credit report, and completed financial management courses. The judge noted that the applicant's financial situation had improved, and she demonstrated a commitment to managing her finances responsibly.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that she had mitigated the financial concerns. The judge emphasized that the circumstances leading to the financial issues were largely beyond the applicant's control and that she had shown evidence of rehabilitation and responsible behavior. As a result, the applicant was granted eligibility for a security clearance.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-02112

grantedJan 30, 2024· Hon. Marc E. Curry· hearing

Summary

A 38-year-old single mother was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons primarily cited approximately $32,000 in delinquent student loan debts across several subparagraphs. Additionally, a $2,593 debt for a motorcycle, for which her ex-boyfriend ceased payments after their separation, was noted. A smaller debt of $363 was also alleged but had been satisfied.

The clearance was granted due to several mitigating factors. The applicant successfully disputed and resolved debts that were a result of identity theft. She also demonstrated responsible financial management by renegotiating her student loan payments, which are now current and in good standing.

Furthermore, the applicant actively engaged in financial counseling courses and has taken proactive steps to manage her finances effectively. These actions collectively demonstrated a commitment to resolving her financial issues, leading to the application of mitigating conditions AG ¶ 20(a), (b), (c), and (d), and ultimately, the granting of her security clearance.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant successfully disputed debts resulting from identity theft.
She demonstrated responsible financial management by renegotiating her student loan payments, which are now in good standing.
The applicant has taken financial counseling courses and actively manages her finances.

Conditions Referenced

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(a)appliedBehavior Unlikely to Recur
AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Largely Beyond Control
AG ¶ 20(c)appliedReceived Financial Counseling
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedReasonable Basis to Dispute Debt

Key Rule Quoted

“Failure to live within one’s means, satisfy debts, and meet financial obligations may indicate poor self-control, lack of judgment, or unwillingness to abide by rules and regulations, all of which can raise questions about an individual’s reliability, trustworthiness, and ability to protect classified or sensitive information.”
— AG ¶ 18

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedOct 17, 2021
Answer filedOct 27, 2021
Hearing heldSep 26, 2023rescheduled twice
Decision dateJan 30, 2024

Cite For

Identity Theft as a Mitigating Factor Under Guideline F
Successful Dispute of Debts in Security Clearance Cases
Importance of Financial Counseling in Mitigating Financial Concerns

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant had approximately $32,000 in delinquent student loan debts, but concluded that these financial concerns were mitigated due to the applicant's proactive steps in managing her finances and addressing identity theft issues. The applicant's debts were ultimately resolved, leading to a favorable decision regarding her security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant incurred approximately $32,000 of delinquent student loan debts, as alleged in subparagraphs 1.a through 1.f, 1.h, and 1.n. $32,000	For Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly	Documented Financial Counseling Documented Budget Change with Documentation
1.b–1.f	5 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (for the applicant). (low confidence)	For Applicant			—	—	—
1.g	The debt alleged in SOR subparagraph 1.g, totaling $2,593, is the motorcycle that Applicant’s ex-boyfriend stopped making loan payments after they separated. (low confidence) $2,593	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.h–1.o	8 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (for the applicant). (low confidence)	For Applicant			—	—	—
1.p	Applicant satisfied the debt alleged in subparagraph 1.p, totaling $363. $363	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.q	specific text not stated in this decision	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.