CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 22-01998 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 22-01998

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/27/2024
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Judge: Carol G. Ricciardello
Government Counsel: Patricia M. Lynch-Epps
Applicant's Counsel: Samir Nakhleh
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 48-year-old individual with an associate degree and various technical certifications, who had been employed for approximately eight years and held a top-secret security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations, specifically the failure to timely file federal and state income tax returns for the years 2014 through 2017. The applicant admitted to the failure to file but explained that he believed he would receive refunds for those years and did not perceive any harm in the delay.
The administrative judge found that the applicant had taken steps to rectify his tax issues by filing the overdue returns in April 2019 and entering into an installment agreement for any state taxes owed. The applicant provided evidence of his timely filing of subsequent tax returns and demonstrated that he had no current financial delinquencies. He acknowledged his past mistakes and expressed a newfound appreciation for the importance of timely tax filing. The judge concluded that the applicant had mitigated the security concerns under Guideline F, ultimately granting him eligibility for access to classified information based on his demonstrated responsibility and the resolution of his financial issues.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 22-01998

grantedMar 27, 2024· Hon. Carol G. Ricciardello· hearing

Summary

This case concerns a 48-year-old applicant whose eligibility for access to classified information was reviewed under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to a history of tax filing issues. The Statement of Reasons alleged that the applicant failed to timely file federal income tax returns for tax years 2014 through 2017, and state income tax returns for the same period. These allegations raised a disqualifying condition under Guideline F.

However, the applicant successfully mitigated these security concerns. He demonstrated that he had timely filed all required tax returns since 2018. Furthermore, he resolved previous tax issues, including state tax debts, through a combination of refunds and payments.

The applicant acknowledged his past mistakes and showed a commitment to fulfilling his legal obligations. Based on these mitigating factors, the decision was to grant the applicant eligibility for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant timely filed all required tax returns since 2018.
He resolved previous tax issues, including state tax debts, through refunds and payments.
The applicant acknowledged his past mistakes and demonstrated a commitment to fulfilling his legal obligations.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(a)appliedThe Behavior Happened so Long Ago, Was so Infrequent, or Occurred Under Such Circumstances That It Is Unlikely to Recur and Does Not Cast Doubt on the Individual’s Current Reliability, Trustworthiness, or Good Judgment
AG ¶ 20(c)notedThe Individual Has Received or Is Receiving Financial Counseling for the Problem From a Legitimate and Credible Source, Such as a Non-profit Credit Counseling Service, and There Are Clear Indications That the Problem Is Being Resolved or Is Under Control
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
AG ¶ 20(g)appliedThe Individual Has Made Arrangements with the Appropriate Tax Authority to File or Pay the Amount Owed and Is in Compliance with Those Arrangements

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedDec 1, 2022
Answer filedDec 20, 2022
Hearing heldMar 12, 2024
Decision dateMar 27, 2024

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Issues Under Guideline F
Importance of Timely Tax Filing in Security Clearance Cases
Demonstrated Responsibility in Resolving Past Financial Delinquencies

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant failed to timely file his federal and state income tax returns for the years 2014 through 2017. However, the applicant mitigated the financial concerns by subsequently filing the delinquent returns and demonstrating a commitment to compliance with tax obligations, resulting in a decision granted in his favor.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant failed to timely file his 2014 through 2017 federal income tax returns.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	—	(a) behavior happened long ago / infrequent / unlikely to recur	Claimed Acknowledgment and Remorse Claimed Debt Paid in Full
1.b	Applicant failed to timely file his 2014 through 2017 state income tax returns.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Denied	—	(a) behavior happened long ago / infrequent / unlikely to recur	Claimed Acknowledgment and Remorse Claimed Debt Paid in Full
1.c	You failed to timely file, as required, Federal tax returns for at least tax years 2015, 2016, and 2017.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Unknown	—	(a) behavior happened long ago / infrequent / unlikely to recur	Claimed Acknowledgment and Remorse Claimed Debt Paid in Full

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.