CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-00226 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 23-00226

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/15/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Roger C. Wesley
Government Counsel: Cynthia Ruckno
Case Summary
the applicant that raise security concerns. In this case, the applicant, a 33-year-old employee of a defense contractor, faced allegations under the financial considerations guideline due to 13 delinquent student loans and eight delinquent consumer debts totaling over $75,000. The Statement of Reasons indicated that these debts remained unresolved and raised questions about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the debts but claimed that his student loans were in a federally-authorized pause and provided explanations for some debts, including an abrupt departure from his apartment due to a family emergency. However, he did not provide documentation for claims of deferment and failed to demonstrate any substantial efforts to address his financial obligations. The applicant's financial situation was further complicated by his low income and lack of a security clearance, which hindered his ability to make progress on his debts.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that he did not mitigate the financial concerns. The judge emphasized that the applicant's failure to address the majority of his debts and lack of a clear plan for repayment indicated poor self-control and judgment, which raised significant security concerns regarding his eligibility for access to classified information. Consequently, the applicant's request for a security clearance was denied.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-00226

deniedAug 15, 2024· Hon. Roger C. Wesley· hearing

Summary

A 33-year-old defense contractor employee was denied a security clearance due to significant financial concerns under Guideline F. The applicant had accumulated 13 delinquent student loans and eight delinquent consumer debts, totaling over $75,000. These issues raised disqualifying conditions 19(a) and 19(c) related to financial irresponsibility.

While the applicant acknowledged the debts and claimed some student loans were in a federally-authorized pause, this did not mitigate the concerns. The applicant failed to provide documented efforts to address the debts or demonstrate a meaningful track record of debt reduction.

Despite the application of mitigating condition 20(b), the applicant's claims of financial hardship were not substantiated by responsible financial management. Consequently, the applicant did not mitigate the financial concerns, leading to the denial of the security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant did not mitigate the financial concerns due to a lack of documented efforts to address his debts.
The applicant's claims of financial hardship were not substantiated by a meaningful track record of debt reduction or responsible financial management.
The applicant's student loans were in a federally-authorized pause, but this did not excuse his previous failures to address the debts.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

20(b)rejectedThe Conditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s ControlThe applicant did not demonstrate that he acted responsibly under the circumstances.

Key Rule Quoted

“Eligibility for access to classified information may only be granted "upon a finding that it is clearly consistent with the national interest to do so."”
— Exec. Or. 10865, Safeguarding Classified Information within Industry § 2 (Feb. 20, 1960), as amended.

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedFeb 28, 2023
Answer filedMar 20, 2023
Hearing heldMay 7, 2024via Microsoft Teams Teleconference Services
Decision dateAug 15, 2024

Cite For

Failure to Demonstrate Responsible Financial Management Under Guideline F
Importance of a Meaningful Track Record of Debt Reduction
Impact of Financial Distress on Security Clearance Eligibility

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The applicant faced significant financial concerns due to 13 delinquent student loans and multiple consumer debts totaling over $75,000. The judge ruled against the applicant on these financial considerations, noting that the applicant admitted to the debts but failed to provide sufficient evidence of mitigation or a plan to address them.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.n	Applicant allegedly accumulated 13 delinquent student loan debts, and eight delinquent consumer debts, exceeding $75,000. $75,000	Against Applicant	Student Loan Debt	Admitted	—	—	—
1.o–1.u	7 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant).	Against Applicant			—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.