CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-00432 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 23-00432

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date1/10/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Richard A. Cefola
Government Counsel: Tara R. Karoian
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 22-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline E, which pertains to personal conduct. The core allegations included the applicant's termination from a previous job for employee theft, admitted marijuana use in June 2022, and falsification of information on an Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (e-QIP) regarding illegal drug use.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the allegations of termination and marijuana use but denied the falsification claim, asserting that he misunderstood the question on the e-QIP. The administrative judge found that the applicant's termination for theft and the admitted drug use raised disqualifying conditions. The judge concluded that the applicant did not make a good-faith effort to correct the falsification and that the mitigating factors did not apply. Ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant, stating that the evidence raised significant doubts about his reliability and trustworthiness, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-00432

deniedJan 10, 2024· Hon. Richard A. Cefola· hearing

Summary

A 22-year-old defense contractor employee was denied a security clearance under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) due to concerns about falsification of information and illegal drug use. The Statement of Reasons included allegations that the applicant was terminated from previous employment for employee theft and used marijuana in June 2022. Additionally, the applicant answered "No" to interrogatories regarding past marijuana use and was alleged to have falsified material facts on an e-QIP concerning illegal drug use.

The administrative judge found that the applicant's conduct raised significant security concerns. Specifically, the termination for employee theft questioned his reliability. While the applicant admitted to using marijuana on one occasion, he was found to have falsified his e-QIP by denying illegal drug use, demonstrating a lack of candor.

The denial was further supported by the finding that the applicant did not make a good-faith effort to correct the falsification before being confronted with the facts. These factors collectively led to the denial of eligibility for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant was terminated from previous employment for employee theft, which raised questions about his reliability.
The applicant admitted to using marijuana but falsified his e-QIP by denying illegal drug use, demonstrating a lack of candor.
The applicant did not make a good-faith effort to correct the falsification before being confronted with the facts.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 16(a)appliedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
AG ¶ 16(c)appliedCredible Adverse Information

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedMay 31, 2023
Answer filedJun 20, 2023
Hearing heldSep 28, 2023
Decision dateJan 10, 2024

Cite For

Lack of Candor Under Guideline E
Falsification of Information in Security Clearance Applications
Impact of Prior Employment Misconduct on Security Clearance Eligibility

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on allegations of employee theft and falsification of material facts regarding drug use. The applicant admitted to using marijuana but claimed it was only on one occasion. The judge concluded that the applicant failed to mitigate the personal conduct concerns, resulting in a denied security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant was terminated from his previous employment for employee theft of merchandise.	Against Applicant	Rules Violation at Workplace	—	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other
1.b	Applicant admits that he used marijuana on 'one occasion' in June 2022.	Against Applicant	Questionable Judgment General	—	Admitted	—	—	—
1.c	Applicant answered 'No' in his response to Interrogatories dated March 25, 2023, as to past marijuana use.	For Applicant	Lack of Candor in InterviewFOUND DELIBERATE	Drug Involvement	Admitted	(b) deliberately providing false information to an investigator or official	—	—
1.d	Applicant falsified material facts on an e-QIP regarding illegal drug use.	Against Applicant	Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE	Drug Involvement	Denied	(b) deliberately providing false information to an investigator or official	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.