CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-01901 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 23-01901

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/7/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeTRUSTWORTHINESS
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Pamela C. Benson
Government Counsel: Brittany C. M. White
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 33-year-old individual seeking a public trust position with the Department of Defense. The adjudicative guideline at issue was Guideline F, concerning financial considerations. The core allegations in the Statement of Reasons indicated that the applicant failed to file his federal and state income tax returns for the year 2021, despite being notified of this issue multiple times.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to not filing his 2021 federal and state tax returns and acknowledged procrastination as a contributing factor. He claimed he had difficulty obtaining necessary documentation from a previous employer and expressed a belief that he did not owe any taxes. However, he did not provide any documentation to support his claims or to demonstrate that he had taken responsible action to resolve his tax issues. The applicant also failed to submit additional evidence after being given the opportunity to do so.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that the trustworthiness concerns under Guideline F were not mitigated. The judge noted that the applicant's procrastination and lack of responsible action demonstrated poor judgment and planning, which were incompatible with the requirements of a public trust position. Consequently, the applicant's eligibility for access to sensitive information was denied.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-01901

deniedAug 7, 2024· Hon. Pamela C. Benson· hearing

Summary

A 33-year-old system support specialist was denied eligibility for a public trust position under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The denial stemmed from the applicant's failure to file both federal and state income tax returns for the 2021 tax year.

The Statement of Reasons specifically alleged that the applicant failed to file the required 2021 tax returns and subsequently failed to take responsible action to resolve these unfiled taxes. These issues raised Disqualifying Condition AG ¶ 19(f).

The decision to deny eligibility was based on the applicant's failure to meet tax obligations and their subsequent inaction despite multiple notifications. This demonstrated a pattern of procrastination and poor judgment, which was deemed indicative of untrustworthiness for a position requiring access to sensitive information.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to file 2021 federal and state income tax returns as required.
The applicant did not take responsible action to resolve his unfiled taxes despite being notified.
Procrastination and poor judgment demonstrated untrustworthiness.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns or Failure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required.

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedFeb 21, 2024
Answer filedApr 1, 2024
Hearing heldJun 6, 2024
Decision dateAug 7, 2024

Cite For

Failure to File Income Tax Returns Under Guideline F
Procrastination as a Factor in Trustworthiness Determinations
Lack of Responsible Action in Financial Matters Affecting Eligibility for Public Trust Positions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant failed to file his 2021 federal and state income tax returns, which raised significant financial concerns under Guideline F. Despite the applicant's admissions and attempts to address the issue, the judge ruled against him, concluding that his actions were not consistent with national security interests.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant failed to file 2021 federal and state income tax returns, as required.	Against Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	(f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	—	—
1.b	Applicant failed to take responsible action to resolve his unfiled taxes.	Against Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	(f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.