Summary
A 29-year-old mechanical engineer was denied a security clearance under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) due to repeated instances of marijuana use and falsification of information on security questionnaires and during interviews. The applicant admitted to using marijuana from October 2013 through December 2018, and less than once per year after 2018, potentially through July 2019.
The denial was primarily based on the applicant's deliberate failure to disclose this marijuana use across multiple security questionnaires (SF85s in March 2018 and April 2019, and an SF86 in June 2021) and during several interviews with authorized DOD investigators (October 2019, July 2021, and December 2021). Additionally, the applicant deliberately failed to disclose a previous clearance denial and subsequent termination from a position with Employer C on a June 2021 SF86.
Despite the applicant's admission of past marijuana use and submission of negative drug tests, the judge found significant concerns regarding reliability and trustworthiness due to the pattern of omissions and dishonesty. The repeated falsifications over several years, including the nondisclosure of a prior clearance denial and employment termination, led to the ultimate denial of the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant admitted to using marijuana from 2013 to 2018 and potentially through July 2019, raising concerns about compliance with rules and regulations.
- The applicant repeatedly failed to disclose his marijuana use in multiple security questionnaires and interviews, demonstrating a lack of candor and honesty.
- The applicant's history of falsifications extended over several years and included omissions of a previous clearance denial and employment termination.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 16(a)appliedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
- AG ¶ 16(b)appliedDeliberately Providing False or Misleading Information
- AG ¶ 16(c)appliedCredible Adverse Information in Several Adjudicative Issue Areas
- AG ¶ 17(c)appliedThe Offense Is so Minor, or so Much Time Has Passed, or the Behavior Is so InfrequentThe applicant has established a long period of abstinence from marijuana and provided negative drug tests.
Key Rule Quoted
“Eligibility for access to classified information is denied.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJun 26, 2024
- Answer filedAug 23, 2024
- Hearing heldJun 4, 2025
- Decision dateSep 2, 2025
Cite For
- Issues of Personal Conduct Under Guideline E
- The Impact of Falsification on Security Clearance Eligibility
- The Importance of Candor in Security Clearance Applications