Summary
A 45-year-old engineer was granted a security clearance despite past financial difficulties, which were primarily attributed to a custody battle and subsequent foreclosure. The applicant demonstrated a commitment to resolving these issues and has maintained a stable financial situation since 2008.
Regarding specific allegations, the applicant paid a $240 medical account in full in May 2013 after identifying the account holder. A charged-off credit account for $4,921 was settled for a reduced amount of $904 and paid in full. For a $6,606 collection account, the applicant learned it had been sold to a company no longer in business, and post-hearing documentation confirmed a zero balance. An account that was 120 days late had $859 paid on it. The applicant also researched a $9,238 collection account but found the company was no longer in business, providing documentation to support this. The status of a $219,000 first mortgage, following a 2009 foreclosure sale, remains unknown, and the applicant plans to seek a written update.
The clearance was granted because the applicant's financial issues were largely beyond his control, he made significant efforts to rectify his financial standing, and he was found to be candid and credible in his testimony.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant's financial difficulties were primarily due to circumstances beyond his control, including a custody battle and foreclosure.
- He has made significant efforts to pay off delinquent debts and has maintained a stable financial situation since 2008.
- The applicant was candid and credible in his testimony, demonstrating responsibility in managing his finances.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- AG ¶ 20(a)appliedThe Behavior Happened so Long Ago, Was so Infrequent, or Occurred Under Such Circumstances That It Is Unlikely to Recur
- AG ¶ 20(b)appliedThe Conditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person's Control
- AG ¶ 20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
- AG ¶ 20(e)appliedThe Individual Has a Reasonable Basis to Dispute the Legitimacy of the Past-due Debt
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJan 17, 2013
- Answer filed—
- Hearing heldMay 9, 2013
- Decision dateJun 19, 2013
Cite For
- Mitigating Conditions Under Guideline F Related to Financial Difficulties Caused by Circumstances Beyond the Applicant's Control
- The Importance of Demonstrating a Good-faith Effort to Resolve Financial Issues
- The Relevance of the Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Determinations