Summary
A 43-year-old technician, employed by a DoD contractor, was denied a security clearance under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) due to falsifications on his SF 86. The applicant deliberately omitted or concealed relevant facts concerning his alcohol-related arrests and a prior security clearance revocation. These omissions were identified as disqualifying conditions under E2.A5.1.2.2.
The judge found the applicant's explanations for these omissions to be inconsistent and not credible. Specifically, the applicant's dishonesty and lack of candor in providing false or misleading information on a personnel security questionnaire were central to the denial.
Ultimately, the judge concluded that the applicant's lack of candor indicated he might not properly safeguard classified information, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant falsified relevant and material facts on his SF 86 regarding alcohol-related arrests and the revocation of his security clearance.
- The applicant's explanations for his omissions were inconsistent and not credible.
- The applicant's dishonesty and lack of candor raised significant security concerns.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A5.1.2.2raisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant and Material Facts
Key Rule Quoted
“A person who seeks access to classified information enters a fiduciary relationship with the Government predicated upon trust and confidence.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 14, 2001
- Answer filedJan 18, 2002Requested decision without a hearing.
- Hearing held—No hearing was conducted.
- Decision dateSep 23, 2002
Cite For
- Falsification of Information on SF 86 Under Guideline E
- Lack of Candor as a Disqualifying Factor for Security Clearance
- Credibility of Applicant's Explanations Regarding Past Conduct