Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Failure to Disclose Foreign Association

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does failure to disclose foreign association affect a security clearance?

Failure to Disclose Foreign Association is an issue decided under Guideline B, Foreign Influence. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 84 hearing-level cases, and 42% of the 84 decided ended with access granted (35 granted, 49 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 84 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

84

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

42%

35 granted · 49 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 8(a) · A conflict between foreign and United States interests is unlikely

    In granted cases
    16
    In denied cases
    0
  • ¶ 8(b) · Deep and longstanding ties to the United States

    In granted cases
    10
    In denied cases
    0
  • ¶ 8(c) · Contact so casual and infrequent that there is little risk

    In granted cases
    8
    In denied cases
    1
  • ¶ 8(e) · Reporting requirements met promptly

    In granted cases
    5
    In denied cases
    0

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 9 granted cases
  • foreign passport surrendered · credited in 3 granted cases
  • contact disclosed to authorities · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old defense contractor seeking to reacquire national security eligibility and a security clearance after previously holding a clearance without incident. The D…

  • The judge found that the applicant's foreign ties to Iraq and Iran raised security concerns under Guideline B, but ultimately determined that these ties were outweighed by her strong connections and l…

  • The applicant in this case was a 41-year-old dual citizen of Djibouti and the United States, who applied for a security clearance to work as a linguist for a federal contractor. The Department of Defe…

  • The applicant in this case was a 68-year-old dual citizen of the United States and Israel, who had served in the Israeli Defense Forces and was employed as a principal software engineer with a defense…

See all 84 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline B

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.