Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline B · Foreign Influence
Foreign Bank Account / Investment
Does foreign bank account / investment affect a security clearance?
Basis: 260 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.
Decided cases
260
hearing-level decisions raising this issue
Granted
57%
149 granted · 111 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions cited
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 8(a) · A conflict between foreign and United States interests is unlikely | 60 | 4 |
| ¶ 8(b) · Deep and longstanding ties to the United States | 40 | 4 |
| ¶ 8(f) · Foreign interests too small to be used for influence | 30 | 2 |
| ¶ 8(e) · Reporting requirements met promptly | 16 | 3 |
| ¶ 8(c) · Contact so casual and infrequent that there is little risk | 12 | 0 |
¶ 8(a) · A conflict between foreign and United States interests is unlikely
- In granted cases
- 60
- In denied cases
- 4
¶ 8(b) · Deep and longstanding ties to the United States
- In granted cases
- 40
- In denied cases
- 4
¶ 8(f) · Foreign interests too small to be used for influence
- In granted cases
- 30
- In denied cases
- 2
¶ 8(e) · Reporting requirements met promptly
- In granted cases
- 16
- In denied cases
- 3
¶ 8(c) · Contact so casual and infrequent that there is little risk
- In granted cases
- 12
- In denied cases
- 0
Circumstances credited in granted cases
- deep U.S. ties · credited in 23 granted cases
- foreign assets divested · credited in 5 granted cases
Recent decided examples
Applicant, an armed security supervisor for a U.S. installation in Kosovo, faced Guideline B allegations based on family ties, a home, and a bank account in Kosovo. He admitted all SOR allegations but…
Applicant, an engineer and former IDF service member, was denied allegations under Guideline B for foreign influence based on family, property, and financial ties to Israel. He admitted the SOR, but t…
The applicant's security clearance application was denied due to failure to mitigate foreign influence concerns related to relationships with individuals from the People's Republic of China. The appli…
The applicant's eligibility for access to classified information was denied due to unmitigated foreign influence security concerns. Despite admitting to all allegations, including maintaining foreign …
Related issues under Guideline B
How these numbers are measured
Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.
Reading the statistics
- Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
- Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
- † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
- Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
- Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.