Skip to content
CASE
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline I · Psychological

Mood Disorder Diagnosed

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does mood disorder diagnosed affect a security clearance?

Mood Disorder Diagnosed is an issue decided under Guideline I, Psychological. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 112 hearing-level cases, and 25% of the 110 decided ended with access granted (28 granted, 82 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 110 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

112

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

25%

28 granted · 82 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.

  • ¶ 29(b) · In counseling or treatment voluntarily, with a favorable prognosis

    In granted cases
    7
    In denied cases
    5

  • ¶ 29(a) · The condition is controllable with treatment, and treatment is being followed

    In granted cases
    5
    In denied cases
    2

  • ¶ 29(c) · A recent professional opinion that the condition is under control

    In granted cases
    3
    In denied cases
    2

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • ongoing treatment compliance · credited in 1 granted case
  • treatment compliance · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 25-01563Granted2026

    This case involves security concerns regarding the applicant's alcohol consumption, drug involvement, psychological conditions, and personal conduct. The applicant admitted to several allegations rela…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00051Granted2026

    The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who has been diagnosed with PTSD, Major Depressive Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder. The applicant admitted to several allegation…

  • ISCR Case No. 24-01678Denied2026

    The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who faced allegations under Guidelines I, G, and E, primarily related to psychological conditions, alcohol consumption, and personal conduct. …

  • ISCR Case No. 25-01007Denied2026

    The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved concerns under Guideline E related to personal conduct, despite mitigating factors for drug involvement and psychological conditions. Th…

See all 112 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline I

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.