Skip to content
CASE
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline I · Psychological

Unspecified Psychological Condition

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does unspecified psychological condition affect a security clearance?

Unspecified Psychological Condition is an issue decided under Guideline I, Psychological. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 139 hearing-level cases, and 32% of the 138 decided ended with access granted (44 granted, 94 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 138 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

139

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

32%

44 granted · 94 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.

  • ¶ 29(b) · In counseling or treatment voluntarily, with a favorable prognosis

    In granted cases
    7
    In denied cases
    0

  • ¶ 29(a) · The condition is controllable with treatment, and treatment is being followed

    In granted cases
    6
    In denied cases
    0

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • ongoing treatment compliance · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 25-01336Granted2026

    The case involves an applicant who submitted a security clearance application and faced allegations under Guideline I and E. The administrative judge found sufficient evidence to mitigate the concerns…

  • ISCR Case No. 22-00396Granted2025

    The applicant in this case was a 51-year-old director of a software management project for a defense contractor, who sought a security clearance after submitting her application in October 2020. The D…

  • ISCR Case No. 24-01678Denied2026

    The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who faced allegations under Guidelines I, G, and E, primarily related to psychological conditions, alcohol consumption, and personal conduct. …

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00539Denied2026

    The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who faced allegations under Guidelines I and G. The applicant admitted to some allegations related to alcohol consumption but denied others, p…

See all 139 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline I

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.