Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline I · Psychological

Unspecified Psychological Condition

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
135
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
34%
45 granted · 89 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 29(b)60
¶ 29(a)50

What judges credited in granted cases

Specific circumstances the judge expressly credited, among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted (a subset of the record, so these are raw counts, not rates).

  • ongoing treatment compliance · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 17-04325 granted · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 41-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance after previously holding a top secret clearance. The Department of Defense (DOD) issued a
  • ISCR 18-01484 granted · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 39-year-old employee of a defense contractor who faced security concerns under Guideline I, related to psychological conditions. The Department of Defense issued a Sta
  • ISCR USAF-M Case No. 23-00056-R denied · 2024
    The applicant in this case was a military service member who sought a security clearance after the Department of Defense (DoD) raised concerns regarding his alcohol consumption and psychological condi
  • ISCR 15-02352 denied · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 59-year-old male employed by a defense contractor, seeking to retain his security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing concerns un

See all 135 decisions on this issue →

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.