CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-01958 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 21-01958

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/1/2022
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Elizabeth M. Matchinski
Government Counsel: Carroll J. Connelley
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 37-year-old technician employed by a defense contractor, who sought a security clearance after previously serving in the U.S. Army Reserve. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under multiple adjudicative guidelines, including alcohol consumption, drug involvement, criminal conduct, and personal conduct. The core allegations included multiple arrests for driving under the influence (DUI) and a failure to disclose a marijuana possession charge on his security clearance application.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the DUI offenses but denied any intentional concealment of his criminal history, claiming he was unaware of the requirement to report his arrests to his facility security officer. He explained that the marijuana found in his vehicle belonged to a former colleague and asserted that he had forgotten about the marijuana charge when completing his application. The administrative judge found that while the applicant had shown some mitigating factors, such as informing his supervisors about his arrests, he had not demonstrated sufficient reform or candor regarding his past conduct.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled against the applicant, denying his security clearance eligibility. The judge concluded that the applicant's repeated offenses and lack of full disclosure raised significant concerns about his reliability and trustworthiness, which were not adequately mitigated by his explanations or character references.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · Against Applicant
- Guideline GAlcohol Consumption · Against Applicant
- Guideline HDrug Involvement & Substance Misuse · Against Applicant
- Guideline JCriminal Conduct · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-01958

deniedAug 1, 2022· Hon. Elizabeth M. Matchinski· hearing

Summary

A 37-year-old technician was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guidelines E (Personal Conduct), G (Alcohol Consumption), H (Drug Involvement), and J (Criminal Conduct). Disqualifying conditions included a lack of candor, alcohol-related incidents, drug involvement, and criminal conduct.

The applicant failed to disclose a marijuana possession charge and multiple DUI arrests during the application process. His repeated DUI offenses and failure to self-report the 2018 DUIs to his facility security officer were significant concerns. These actions raised doubts about his reliability and trustworthiness.

While some mitigating factors were present, such as a lack of recent offenses, they were insufficient to overcome the serious concerns regarding the applicant's candor and pattern of behavior. Ultimately, the judge found that the applicant's conduct warranted the denial of security clearance eligibility.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant exhibited a lack of candor during the application process, including failing to disclose a marijuana possession charge and multiple DUI arrests.
The applicant's behavior raised doubts about his reliability and trustworthiness, particularly due to the recidivism of his DUI offenses.
The applicant's failure to self-report his 2018 DUIs to his facility security officer was a significant concern.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 25(c)raisedIllegal Possession of a Controlled Substance
AG ¶ 22(a)raisedAlcohol-related Incidents Away From Work
AG ¶ 31(a)raisedPattern of Minor Offenses
AG ¶ 30raisedCriminal Conduct Creates Doubt About Judgment

Mitigating

AG ¶ 26(a)appliedBehavior Happened so Long Ago
AG ¶ 32(d)appliedEvidence of Successful Rehabilitation

Key Rule Quoted

“A person who seeks access to classified information enters into a fiduciary relationship with the Government predicated upon trust and confidence.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedDec 1, 2021
Answer filedJan 11, 2022
Hearing heldJun 8, 2022
Decision dateAug 1, 2022

Cite For

Lack of Candor During the Application Process Under Guideline E
Recidivism of DUI Offenses Under Guideline G
Impact of Criminal Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility Under Guideline J

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.