CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-02679 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 21-02679

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date8/28/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Darlene Lokey Anderson
Government Counsel: Brian L. Farrell
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 43-year-old individual employed as a gardener by a defense contractor, seeking a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons citing concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The allegations included a history of drug use, dishonesty in his security clearance application, and significant delinquent debts totaling over $25,000.
The applicant admitted to the allegations under Guideline E, including a prior marijuana possession citation and a termination from a government job due to a positive drug test. He initially denied any drug involvement during interviews but later admitted to using marijuana after being confronted with evidence. Regarding financial issues, he acknowledged the delinquent debts but provided no evidence of efforts to resolve them.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that his admissions and the evidence presented demonstrated a lack of reliability and trustworthiness. The judge emphasized the importance of honesty in the security clearance process and noted that the applicant's failure to disclose relevant information and his ongoing financial issues raised significant concerns about his ability to safeguard classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline EPersonal Conduct · Against Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-02679

deniedAug 28, 2023· Hon. Darlene Lokey Anderson· hearing

Summary

A 43-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant admitted to drug use and significant delinquent debt, which totaled in excess of approximately $25,650.

Specifically, the applicant provided false information on his security clearance application regarding prior drug use and the circumstances of an employment termination. This conduct raised questions about his judgment, candor, and trustworthiness, aligning with disqualifying conditions E2.a and E2.b.

Furthermore, the applicant failed to demonstrate good faith efforts to resolve his financial issues, consistent with disqualifying condition F2.c. The administrative judge concluded that the applicant's dishonesty and financial irresponsibility precluded a favorable security clearance decision, resulting in a denial.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant admitted to drug use and significant delinquent debt.
He provided false information on his security clearance application regarding drug use and employment termination.
The applicant failed to demonstrate good faith efforts to resolve his financial issues.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

E2.araisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
E2.braisedDeliberately Providing False or Misleading Information
F2.craisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJan 9, 2023
Answer filedJan 18, 2023
Hearing held—Applicant requested a decision on the written record without a hearing.
Decision dateAug 28, 2023

Cite For

Dishonesty in Security Clearance Applications Under Guideline E
Financial Irresponsibility as a Disqualifying Factor Under Guideline F
Failure to Mitigate Security Concerns Related to Personal Conduct and Financial Issues

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline E (Personal Conduct) · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found against the applicant on the personal conduct allegations, which included questionable judgment and lack of candor regarding drug use and employment history. The applicant admitted to the allegations but failed to mitigate the concerns raised about his reliability and trustworthiness.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant's conduct has involved questionable judgment, lack of candor, dishonesty, or unwillingness to comply with rules and regulations that raise questions about his reliability, trustworthiness, and ability to protect classified or sensitive information.	Against Applicant	Lack of Candor in InterviewFOUND DELIBERATE	Drug Involvement	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline E). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant incurred delinquent debt totaling over $25,650, which raised significant financial concerns under Guideline F. The applicant admitted to the debts but failed to provide evidence of any efforts to resolve them, leading to a decision against the applicant.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
2.a	Applicant incurred delinquent debt totaling in excess of approximately $25,650. $25,650	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.